An International Network

QUIET PLEASE! CHILDREN TALKING

Silvia Bacher and Monica Beltran, respectively communication and education specialist and Buenos Aires-based journalist
photo
“Keep the presses rolling!” Media workshops in Buenos Aires schools have mobilized tremendous enthusiasm.







photo

Budding journalists choose photos for their school newspaper and learn about page layout.











photo

When they are given a video camera and sent out on an assignment, young people can find out for themselves how journalism works.







AN INTERNATIONAL NETWORK

Argentina’s budding journalists have colleagues in other countries including France, Chile, South Korea, Switzerland and Benin. Working together, these young reporters put out a weekly magazine for children called Fax!, which was launched in France in 1989 by the Centre for Liaison between Teaching and Information Media (CLEMI).
Each issue is put together by a group of children from a single school who organize an editorial team, draw up a table of contents around a general theme and commission articles from young correspondents in different countries. The contributions are sent in by fax.
The editors responsible for the issue take charge of the magazine’s design and its distribution by fax to the participating schools, which use it in language lessons. Each number of Fax! is produced in two languages, though not always the same ones.
Judging by the headlines and contents, some of the topics chosen by the young journalists would be the envy of quite a few of their adult colleagues. For example, schoolchildren in the Romanian town of Timisoara produced in 1999 an issue called “Different but not indifferent.” Children in Guadeloupe, aware of the need to teach by example, printed their issue, titled “The environment: we’re all responsible”, on recycled paper.
Fax!, which is now up to its 170th issue, is aimed at children between 11 and 18. It also produces an edition called Fax Junior! for 6-to-11-year-olds who are taking their first steps in written journalism.

Centre de Liaison de l’enseignement et des moyens d’information
(Centre for Liaison between Teaching and Information Media [Clemi]),
391 bis rue de Vaugirard, 75015 Paris,
France.

Armed with microphones, tape recorders and cameras, the schoolchildren of Buenos Aires are learning to express their opinions and look at the news with a critical eye

The teacher asks her pupils to listen to the tape of a radio news item in which a government official says immigrants are to blame for other people being out of work. The statement makes a strong impact. The children, fifth grade pupils at a school in the Parque Avellaneda district of Buenos Aires, fall silent. Then Amparo, a 10-year-old Bolivian girl, speaks up. “When I was in hospital,” she says, “they didn’t want me to stay. They shouted at my mother and said: ‘go back to your country.’ They didn’t give my father a job because he’s Bolivian.”
The news story, and Amparo’s reaction to it, gave the children the idea of choosing “Immigrants at School” as a topic for their radio broadcasting workshop.
“We chose the subject because most of the children here are Bolivian,” says the school librarian, Fany Opino. “The first thing we do is collect information. Then we rehearse the programme before it goes on the air. But the most important thing is that the children not only think about a situation they come up against every day, but that they feel they’re being listened to.”
The radio workshop is part of a Media Production in Schools scheme started up 10 years ago by the Journalism, Communications and Education Committee of the city of Buenos Aires. The scheme is known as the child journalist project but its aim is not so much to train young reporters as to increase the children’s capacity to express their opinions and to use the media to help them to think for themselves.
For the “Immigrants at School” workshop, the children were asked to go out and interview immigrants, in some cases their own relatives. They wrote up their reports, read them out in class and discussed them. Then they collected material about racial discrimination from books and magazines. Finally, they worked out a structure, chose some music and put their radio programme together.
In the child journalist scheme, the process whereby children investigate, discuss, defend their opinions and listen to others, is more important than the end product, whether it be a newspaper, a video or a radio programme. In other words, the school is given the key task of training citizens who can think critically about the world they live in. “The workshop on immigrants helped me to understand why people sometimes shout at me in the street,” says Maria Esperanza, another Bolivian pupil.
According to the teacher, making the radio programme enabled the children to know what it feels like to be rejected because of skin colour or place of origin. It also taught them to look at radio and television news with a critical eye and, through their own communication media, to protest against the plight of those who feel victimized.
Producing radio programmes and magazines is a well-established activity in many countries’ education systems. The Argentine programme has some unique features, however, because of the political and social context in which it developed in the late 1980s. The long years of military dictatorship and censorship had instilled a culture of silence into Argentine society. Within communities, the lines of communication were broken or frayed. The media production project seemed to be a good option for strengthening democratic practices via the school and for repairing the social fabric by building bridges between the school and the community and teaching children to interpret critically messages transmitted by the media.

Breaking the culture of silence
This objective may well be the key factor in the success of a programme which has managed to survive both lack of funding and political vicissitudes. In 10 years, the number of schools involved has grown from 34 to more than 200, most of them in poor neighbourhoods of Buenos Aires. About 50,000 children, mostly of primary school age but also some older children and some in special schools, have worked as reporters, editors, announcers, picture or film editors, researching, planning and producing more than 600 school magazines, 700 hours of radio programmes broadcast by local radio stations and about 100 videos.
The fact that the topics covered by the workshops are suggested by the children themselves and reflect their interests and needs is in itself a small revolution. Titles such as “From junior to senior”, “Generation 2000” and “From caning to caring” give an idea of the subjects that most interested these budding journalists: relations with adults, human rights, violence, ecology and discrimination.
Some topics are directly related to the school curriculum (the role of women in history, mathematics, climate change and health care); others focus on community problems and lead to specific action.
Children who took part in one journalism workshop, for example, were worried about the disappearance of trees near their school, so they carried out a “tree census” in the neighbourhood. They interviewed the oldest residents, talked with experts and officials, and expressed their concern in a video made for the community. Then they launched a campaign to replant the area with trees.
Other children made a video about the rights of children “so that adults know more about us and don’t mistreat us.” This led them to take an interest in the lives of street children, some of whom they interviewed to find out how they managed to survive.
Workshop activities can also be purely creative and artistic. The presence of a Ukrainian child among sixth-graders at a school in the Caballito district gave the children the idea of collecting information about Slavonic history and culture. Next, they decided to create a puppet show based on Stravinsky’s ballet Petrushka and to video it. “They researched the composer’s life and work, went to see some ballet and, helped by craft and science teachers, made the
puppets and wrote the script,” says the school’s music teacher, Lucia Salgado.
One of the biggest and most persistent obstacles to changing the old education model is the lack of properly trained teachers, and so theoretical and practical teacher training has been made a key element in the child journalist scheme. Once a week over two months, groups of interested teachers get together to produce and discuss media material with the help of a colleague who has classroom experience of the scheme. With Unesco support, the programme has since 1994 built up a network of 350 teachers with special skills.

New horizons for teachers
Participants say the media workshops help them to recover their appetite for enquiry and learning in a school context which is by and large unexciting. For the children, they mean greater freedom and more contact with real life. “The workshops allow us to interview people and go out into town, while in the classroom we read and study to pass exams,” says one young reporter. They open new horizons for teachers like Monica, who described how she learned to have more respect for the children’s experience and realized that she had no monopoly on wisdom. “The workshop enables us to break free from stereotypes and find out things for ourselves,” she says.
Teachers taking part in the experiment agree that producing radio programmes and newspapers is a good way of fostering children’s verbal and writing skills since it doesn’t involve reciting a lesson from memory but getting across personal ideas and opinions clearly and effectively so that readers and listeners outside the classroom can grasp them. The school newspapers the children produce, either in the form of a single sheet or a magazine, are distributed in the school and the neighbourhood. The videos they make are usually shown at school festivals and other special events that parents and neighbours can attend. Since 1994, radio programmes have been broadcast weekly on FM community stations as part of a series called “Kaleidoscope: Children’s Voices.”

Learning to decode media messages
The purpose of the Buenos Aires scheme is not to set schools against the media but to channel the natural enthusiasm of children and teenagers. Latin American children spend an average of four hours a day watching TV or listening to music on the radio. Argentina’s Educational Television Foundation discovered that out of 10.5 million households, 9.5 million have a television set and more than half of them are signed up with some kind of pay-TV, making Argentina number three in the world in terms of cable TV subscribers.
By the time children get to the age of 16, they’re spending about 46,000 hours a year sleeping, 22,000 watching TV and 13,000 at school. “Television became the main cultural activity of the 20th century,” says Sara Critto, the head of the Foundation. “But schools don’t take account of this and children aren’t properly prepared for it.”
The most influential media in Latin American countries—radio, TV and the written press—are often controlled by small but powerful groups which usually obey economic interests and pay little regard to the citizen’s right to information. What’s more, the social context leaves little time for the clash of ideas and provides meagre access to sources of information outside television and radio. This sometimes produces audiences addicted to certain editorial approaches which sacrifice accuracy to newsiness.
But using the latest computer or a film camera doesn’t necessarily sharpen the critical faculties. Technology cannot replace the teacher, whose role should be to help children analyse the news. By producing informative material, children learn how to accept the existence of conflicting viewpoints, distinguish opinion from facts and objectivity from sensationalism, and find out how to attract a reader’s or listener’s attention.
All these experiences help children understand the nuts and bolts of communication from the inside. They soon realize that a news story is not the same thing as “the facts” but a compilation that is rarely 100 per cent objective because it depends on who is doing the reporting. The American essayist Alvin Toffler has said that to prevent children becoming passive receivers and to teach them how to decode media messages, “the best thing is to give them video cameras and send them out to film something by themselves. They will soon learn to interpret the media in a critical way. They’ll also find out how easily images and ideas can be manipulated, how to spot hidden advertising in entertainment programmes, and see how politicians use demagogic pictures and opportunistic poses.”
Media programme production will not become widespread in Latin American schools until political leaders are convinced of the need for them and the reluctance of the schools is overcome. The impact of the media is so great that schools cannot stand by and do nothing. Whether teachers like it or not, the media are in competition with schools as agents of socialization.
Teachers should realize that although they have little money to buy new equipment and although there are many obstacles to tackling extracurricular subjects, the media and new technology can be their allies and schools are the most suitable place to teach children how to master media skills, interpret media messages and equip children to question them.


Producción de medios en la escuela. Reflexiones desde la práctica. Coordinación de Periodismo, Comunicación y Educación, Secretaría de Educación, Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires, 1998.
• Internet:
http://www.buenosaires.gov.ar/educacion/
chicosperiodistas
sbacher@rocketmail.com

The UNESCO Courier