Le Courrier

sommaire
d'ici... opinion notre planete
ethiques signes connexions dires
dossier
2. Movers and shakers
| Organic rebel | Igorots: in defence of home | Ecuador: beyond the dollar coup | Banana blues | Justice for janitors in Silicon Valley | Connected and capable |

Key indicators

The fishermen’s firebrand takes on the fleets

Interview by Ivan Briscoe, UNESCO Courier journalist.
photo
A small Indian port threatened by industrial fishing.








Key indicators

Population
(millions, 1998): 982.2
GNP ($ billions): 427.4
GNP per capita
($): 440
Population below
income poverty line of $1 a day (%): 44.2


Source: UNDP Human Development Report 2000

Father Thomas Kocherry has been catapulted into leading India’s 10-million-strong fishing community in its campaign against industrial fleets, shrimp farms and coastal pollution

“The life of the planet and the dependent health and welfare of humanity must not be sacrificed to the greed of the few,” declared Father Thomas Kocherry last year on being awarded the Sophie’s Prize, created by Norwegian novelist Jostein Gaardner, for his environmental work. Famed for his powerful oratory, this Catholic priest helped to create the World Forum of Fish Harvesters and Fish Workers in 1997, of which he is now a co-ordinator.

The last ten years have been marked by a series of protests by fisherpeople across India, in which you have been deeply involved. Why are fishing communities so angry?
In 1991 India introduced its new economic policy, which marked the beginning of a new deep sea fishing policy. Huge foreign vessels, working under the guise of joint ventures and fees paid to the government, were given licenses and started coming into Indian waters. There are some 25,000 such vessels around the world. They have depleted all the oceans apart from the Indian Ocean, and are a threat to over 100 million people in developing countries who depend on fisheries for their livelihood. So this new policy was clearly going to affect Indian fisherpeople, and probably displace them. Ten million fisherpeople went on four all-India strikes. The government appointed the Murari committee, which made 21 recommendations aimed at changing the entire deep sea fishing policy. These were accepted by the Cabinet, and since 1996, the government has stopped giving new licenses. For probably the first time, a fishing community changed the policy of globalization through protest.

Your movement has also expressed particular concern over shrimp production for export.
First of all, you have to ask why aquacultures [shrimp farms] exist. It’s because a particular variety like shrimp, cuttle fish or salmon is already depleted, and is no longer available in the marine sector. But the very fact that it is a monoculture means trouble, because it depends on a high use of pesticides and artificial manure. This pollutes the entire area. Then the paddy-fields, which are meant for the people’s basic needs, are converted. Then the mangroves are destroyed, though they are the breeding ground for many species. By bringing in saline water, you pollute the drinking water meant for local people. The entire development [around 200,000 hectares of coastal land have been converted into shrimp farms] is displacing coastal people and fishing communities. And all this intensive aquaculture of shrimps is controlled by big companies, big investors and big rich people—and funded by the World Bank. It is a philosophy of rape and run: you make the money fast, then you run away.
In 1996, the Supreme Court ordered all the aquaculture farms in the country to be abolished. But instead of abolishing them, the government and political parties sided with the World Bank and multinational companies, and ordered a review of the judgement. They then introduced a new Aquaculture Authority bill, which is pending approval by the Upper House of Parliament. Fisherpeople are very angry about this.

How has the experience of Indian fishermen differed from that of other fishing communities around the world?
Whether in India, the U.S. or Europe, small boats and small communities have no chance of survival. Everywhere the pattern is the same: only the big will survive, and the rest will be wiped out.
But globalization’s victims can change the situation. From Senegal to Brazil, from Canada to South Africa, fisherpeople are struggling against destructive fishing and the stronghold of multinationals. Local communities should be the custodians of this natural capital.