Le Courrier

sommaire dossier
d'ici... opinion notre planete
ethiques signes connexions dires
opinion
The wonderful world of filmmaking

By Martín Rejtman, Argentine filmmaker, director of Silvia Prieto (1999)

When you make films and are lucky enough to get one shown at a festival, you can then set off round the world taking your movie from one festival to another. It’s a big opportunity, not just for making your name–vital for those of us outside mainstream cinema–but also because you discover other independent films and come to realize you’re not alone.
I have followed this filmmaker’s pilgrimage, and have met fellow directors in Taiwan, South Korea, Japan and Iran. In Berlin, Nantes, Rotterdam and at Sundance, I have also witnessed a powerful new wave of films coming from Asia that has coincided with a revival of filmmaking in Latin America. There is no single theme or style. Each film is different, but all are intent on depicting real life and all are made with paltry resources.
I shot one of my films, Rapado (Close Cut), with a grant from the Rotterdam festival to write a script outline. What pays for a synopsis in Europe can fund a whole feature film in Argentina. Having no money isn’t a virtue, but it does focus your mind and forces you to look for narrative solutions that fit your budget. Japanese filmmakers agree with us South Americans that film schools should be used as a nursery for directors and technicians, and as a way into the profession. Buenos Aires now has more than 15 film schools, a profusion that can only inspire people to make films.
Has Western cinema lost its way? Maybe, but there are still some great directors. Films made in developed countries these days tend to suffocate you with the same tired old plots and easy images drawn from ubiquitous television. In Iran, you can still tackle a subject in a fresh and innocent way and film something with the feeling that you are showing it on screen for the first time. Iranian film is rife with this “first-time” element, and it’s what gives it special strength. Filmmakers in Taiwan work under different conditions, but they too have managed to get down to basics by delving into their country’s past and casting light on a society that sometimes doubts its very existence.
You can’t say the same for the Japanese film industry, which has a long history and is now rivalled by a fast-growing audio-visual world of TV channels and video games. There’s no room for innocence here, only crafty, intelligent and subversive use of current formats. Directors from Japan and Hong Kong borrow advertising, video and other well-worn techniques to tell other stories and spark a different set of emotions.
This upsurge of “new waves” may be related to the general decline or disappearance of government subsidies for filmmaking. Apart from the United States, where such help isn’t needed because of the captive domestic market, government aid to local film industries has dried up in most countries. The subsidies that remain have in any case stagnated, with money nearly always going to the same places. It would be tremendous if governments were to back something that has now begun to flower naturally in so many parts of the world.
A lack of state support has perhaps given rise to another trend. This is the rise of new producers, individuals and institutions working without any national anchoring. It’s another form of globalization, aimed at specific film projects satisfying particular desires and needs, bringing together people who share a love for a special kind of cinema and a wish to see something different to the deathless fare served up by giant distribution chains.