Le Courrier

sommaire
d'ici... opinion notre planete
ethiques signes connexions dires
dossier
3. Notes of caution
| New Zealand: the price of the market model | Money over merit | Beyond economics |
Offshore threats

Interview by Cynthia Guttman, UNESCO Courier journalist.
photo
© Alain Le Quernec, France








Education is the art of making man ethical.

Georg Friedrich Hegel, German philosopher, (1770-1831)

The impending flood of offshore courses may do more than lure students away from the public system. It may shake a pillar of national cohesion, says Gajaraj Dhanarajan, head of the Commonwealth of Learning*

Are online degrees offered by foreign universities eroding the position of national institutions?
The impact has not been significantly felt yet, because a large part of the population in developing countries cannot afford to pay for courses travelling via the Internet from offshore sources. Even when such courses are heavily subsidized, as is the case with the African Virtual University, the cost is prohibitive. An AVU course from Canada, the U.K. or the U.S. is said to be around $200-300 per credit. That’s probably the monthly salary of an academic in one of the countries with an AVU site.

What about in the longer term?
Academic environments run the risk of being destabilized in countries where offshore courses are downloaded. Students who can afford these courses are the ones who have already enjoyed previous privileges, notably a much better secondary education. Offshore degrees provide yet another privilege: they’re an attractive proposition for those wishing to get jobs abroad besides being prized by local employers. So two types of student communities might evolve: an underprivileged class that attends a local university and a privileged class that can use a brand-name “foreign” education. This is likely to create resentment. The local academic community could also become demoralized if it sees itself serving only the second best.

So there is a threat to national cohesion?
Yes. In many developing countries, higher education is seen as a key component of nation-building. I fear this is in danger of being damaged for a number of reasons including a mismatch between offshore curricula and local hopes of building national cohesion, maintaining cultural integrity and addressing local resource needs. What we are seeing with offshore courses is the dumping, at an international level, of products created for domestic consumption.

How much leverage do governments have in this context?
There is very little they can do without running into a string of criticism including accusations of erecting barriers to the free flow of information. Local legislation concerning quality and curriculum can be applied to foreign institutions in real space, but is much more difficult to do in cyberspace. Governments could tax those delivering the product, but ultimately the customer pays. Taxing the user is also difficult to justify because students could argue that they’re already paying for a quality they can’t get locally. Governments could take a stronger moral line, saying yes to a free market but stipulating that a significant part of the curriculum must address local human capital development needs. They have to be persuasive in presenting those arguments in global fora like the World Trade Organization.

How can local institutions improve their standing?
Local capacities have to be developed, and these include making education accessible to those who cannot study within campus walls. Online education is not the only solution. There are open universities in the developing world that do a very good job of taking knowledge to learners through a variety of methods but which are supported at the village level by mentors who can help students. These capacities ought to be developed. Universities in developing countries should become dual-mode institutions to cater to the off-campus population. If those capacities include e-learning, wonderful. But our aim should be to improve access to learning and to internationalize education. This does not mean making education a trade. The issue is too important. Commodifying education does not augur well for the cause of internationalizing education.



*The Commonwealth of Learning is an international organization to encourage the development and sharing of open learning and distance education knowledge, resources and technologies. For more information, see www.col.org