Le Courrier

sommaire

dossier

d'ici...

Opinion

Notre planete

Education

Droits humains

Cultures

Medias

Entretien

Education

The birth of 101

The Canadian divide

Vive a trilingual Quebec!
Filippo Salvatore, communications professor at Concordia University, former member of Quebec’s French Language Council and a former Montreal city councillor
photo
“All Quebec on the march to live in French” in 1989.




photo
“I remember” on every numberplate.



photo
Beware of the language police!









The birth of 101

Before Bill 101, Quebec residents had the right to send their children to either French or English-speaking public schools, which owing to a twist in history were generally organized along religious lines. Back in 1867 when the Canadian confederation first emerged, Quebec had two major ethnic groups: French Catholics and British Protestants. Each group formed their own set of schools within the public system. But by the end of the 19th century, a new immigrant group settled in Montreal and confounded the clean division: the Irish Catholics. The compromise permitting the Irish to attend English schools set an important precedent. Since then, nearly every immigrant group, from Catholic Poles to Italians, has gone through English schools. Even francophone groups, like Moroccan Jews, were sent (by officials) to English classrooms to avoid the Catechism of the French system.
This arrangement suited French Canadians, who didn’t want non-native French-speakers enrolling in their schools. But this tolerance lasted only so long as the French-Canadian birth rate remained high. It quickly faded during the Quiet Revolution when French Quebeckers began breaking free from the strict confines of traditional Catholic society. The new generation moved into the cities, focusing on improving their financial lot rather than settling down to raise large families in the countryside. At precisely the time when French family-size declined, immigration surged, particularly among Italians.
As English schools mushroomed in Montreal, the nationalist movement calling for Quebec independence emerged as a credible and powerful political force. These nationalists demanded measures to “correct” the linguistic and demographic imbalance reflected in the school system. A compromise was sought in 1968 with a law favouring French language instruction. But the nationalists were not satisfied. They wanted all children to attend French schools.
Two years later, French became the official language of Quebec but tensions continued to simmer until a full-fledged language war erupted in 1976, when the new separatist Parti Québécois, founded and led by the charismatic leader René Lévesque, won the provincial election. A year later, the nationalists passed Bill 101, a milestone in Quebec’s language debate.

The laws that forced French into the schools and workplace of Quebec have worked far better than anyone imagined. Trilingualism is gaining ground in the province, much to the chagrin of hard-line nationalists

With her rugged natural beauty and charming accent, Quebec shines as an emblem of cultural resolve in countries with strong minorities, ranging from Spain to Nigeria. The little francophone island thrives in a sea of English-speakers*, thanks to its carefully constructed rampart of laws and educational policies promoting French. But Canada’s “Belle Province” is set to change course: a new government inquiry has found that it’s time to roll back the legal locomotive, Bill 101, which has forced French into the school system and workplace for the past 30 years.
All children must attend French elementary or high schools, according to Bill 101 (also known as the French Language Charter), with one exception: old-time Quebeckers who attended the province’s English elementary schools can choose their children’s language of instruction. French is the rule, however, for all newcomers, from Canada or beyond, until the college or university level.
Born in 1977, Bill 101 is the brainchild of Quebec’s nationalist movement whose ultimate goal has been to separate from the rest of Canada, or at least seek greater autonomy within the federation (
see box). The law stems back to the heady days of the Quiet Revolution, when French Quebeckers (the “Québécois”) wrested control of the province from a powerful English elite, who controlled its huge natural wealth. Then they turned to the cultural landscape, using laws like Bill 101 to “Frenchify” (or “francify”) the schools and workplace as well as the commercial environment through rules restricting the use of English on public signs or even on the beer coasters of a neighbourhood bar. Language police still roam the streets, measuring the letters of billboards to ensure that “Poulet-frit” dominates the fast-food world of “fried chicken,” for example. The provincial government regularly adds a fresh coat of legislative paint to reinforce the spirit of 101. With each major brushstroke another wave of English Quebeckers migrates to other parts of Canada or the U.S.

When the “natives” feel outnumbered
Today the old-stock of English Quebeckers accounts for just 8.5 percent of the population, down from 13 percent in 1971. Yet according to the nationalists, the anglophone threat has not faded but taken on new dimensions, thanks to the “allophones,” a nice way of referring to immigrants whose first language is not French. Every year, about 25,000 to 35,000 immigrants arrive mostly from Latin America, the Middle and Far East. Together the two minorities—anglophone and allophone—comprise 18 percent of the provincial population. The pure wool Québécois still make up about 82 percent of the population, despite having one of the lowest birth rates in the world. But many of these “natives” are convinced that they will soon become a minority in their financial capital, Montreal, where most minority communities settle. According to a survey conducted last year by the daily Le Devoir, 55 percent of all Quebeckers are convinced that French is in danger throughout the province.
So with alarm bells ringing, the provincial government launched an inquiry last year asking “what should Quebec do to ensure the future of the French language?” This kind of inquiry, known as the language estates-general, is somewhat of a ritual. Each time the provincial government pushes for a referendum on separating from the rest of Canada (
see box), they turn up the heat on the language debate by pointing to the lamentable state of French. But after spending more than two million Canadian dollars on a string of public hearings across the province, the nationalists got far more than they bargained for. According to the preliminary report released on June 5, French has never been healthier in the “Belle Province.” “The French language is no longer the property of the majority. It has become the language of everyone,” announced the head of the estates-general, Gérald Larose, a former union leader and long-time Quebec separatist. Almost 95 percent of Quebec residents know and use French in their daily activities, up seven percent in just over a decade.
More than 90 percent of the province’s newly arriving pupils are heading straight for French schools, according to Quebec’s education ministry. Then again, their only alternative is to enroll in the private sector. But Bill 101 cannot force these kids to speak French outside of the classroom, yet many continue to babble and scream the language in the school-yards and playgrounds even in Montreal, where immigrants make up almost half of the French school population.
Even the old-time minorities—anglo- and allophones born and bred in Quebec—have adopted the spirit of 101. These parents could legally send their kids to English schools, yet about 75 percent opt for the French sector. There is one notable exception: the Italians, one of the largest and most established of Quebec’s cultural communities. The majority continue with English schools. Instead of rejecting bilingualism, these families are embracing three languages at once. Franco-Italian marriage rates increase each year. Love, not
coercion, is winning this community over to French.
The trilingual allure has also won over hearts in the estates-general. While the final recommendations aren’t expected before August, the Larose commission dropped a bombshell on June 5: the anglo- and allophone communities are no longer enemies but role models. “The old English-French antagonism in Quebec has been at least a little bit blurred and softened. And maybe a lot,” announced Larose, before laying out a plan to not only promote French but English. Instead of reinforcing Bill 101, as many hard-liners expected, the commission suggested partially dismantling it by, for example, abolishing the language police.

Time to learn English?
According to the Larose commission, Quebec needs a new charter or constitution to officially recognize French as the province’s language of citizenship. Yet, it continued, English also merits respect as the language of Quebec’s official “national minority.” Anglophones would have guaranteed access to judicial services, health care, social assistance programmes and education. “We’re trying to say to the anglophone community that your place in this society is recognized, that your future is assured,” said one of the 11 commission members, Dermod Travis, president of the non-governmental Forum Action Quebec, which aims to promote dialogue among all Quebeckers.
Perhaps the ultimate irony lies in the recommendation that French pupils improve their English. As it stands now, children attending English schools must learn French from the first grade. Yet francophone pupils wait until the fifth grade before taking English classes, which tend to be of rather poor quality. As a result, only about 38 percent of French Quebeckers are bilingual. It’s as if they have been lulled into complacency, convinced that in the land of 101, English isn’t necessary to earn a living. But not only do their job prospects plummet the moment they step outside of Quebec, but the competition is already heating up within as bilingual and trilingual allophones grow in number.
“Blasphemy!” cry the hard-liners of the nationalist Parti Québécois. The state of French remains “precarious” because there are still too many people who speak English in the privacy of their homes. Immigrants may use French in the workplace or at school but, say the hawks, switch immediately into English at home or when socializing. For these hard-liners, integration amounts to assimilation and anything less than that is treason.
If the father of Bill 101, Camille Laurin, wanted to mould newcomers into good neo-Québécois, the result is disappointing. The Bill 101 generation learns to speak French, but still keeps an open mind towards North American culture, while holding on to its own maternal language and values. These young people and their parents generally accept the principle of French dominance in Quebec. It is now time for the Québécois to assume their role as a well-established and respected majority, not a threatened minority. The white, French-stock, Catholic paradigm has been shattered and replaced by a multiracial, multireligious and multilingual one. It is time for less coercion and more incentives.



* Quebeckers represent a quarter of the Canadian population (29.5 million).


The Canadian divide

Quebec’s language debate stretches beyond its provincial boundaries to touch the core of Canadian identity and unity. For the past 30 years, Canada’s ten provinces have tried to amend their constitution to resolve the conflict between a federalist vision of the country and Quebec’s demands for greater sovereignty.
The debate stems back to 1971, when the Québécois nationalist movement first threatened to separate from the rest of Canada, leaving a gaping hole in the middle of the confederation. Prime Minister Pierre Elliott Trudeau, (a French Quebecker), proposed the vision of an officially bilingual and multicultural country, with a strong federal government and ten equal provinces. Separatists like René Lévesque rejected the concept and launched the notion of a political sovereign Quebec, economically “associated” with the rest of Canada.
Lévesque presented this proposition in a referendum that the people of Quebec rejected in 1980. A second referendum was organized in 1995 by Jacques Parizeau, the provincial premier and leader of the Parti Québécois (PQ). Once again, the proposal was rejected but this time by a slim one percent margin. Parizeau attributed the loss to “money and the ethnic vote,” a comment widely interpreted as a xenophobic and anti-Semitic allusion to Montreal’s minority communities. The scandal forced Parizeau to resign.
In 1996, a more conciliatory leader, Lucien Bouchard, took control of the PQ and the seat of the premier. While open to negotiations with the federal government, Bouchard still tried to satisfy the hard-liners of his party by organizing the estates-general on the future of the French language in Quebec. For some of the hawks, the inquiry marked a first step towards another referendum on sovereignty. Once again, a nationalist, Yves Michaud, evoked the spectre of “the Jewish ethnic vote.” Stunned by this anti-Semitism and the deep divisions it caused within the PQ, Bouchard resigned last December. Yet his moderate voice continues to echo in the conciliatory stance of the estates-general.

Top