Environment and development
in coastal regions and in small islands
colbartn.gif (4535 octets)

Dilution of pollution not the answer

By Peter Espeut, Executive Director of the
Caribbean Coastal Area Management (CCAM) Foundation,
writing in the Jamaica Gleaner, 11 November 1998

There is an old engineering saying, that "dilution of pollution is the solution". Because of this, in Jamaica there is very little waste-water treatment to remove substances that damage the environment. Instead, the waste-water is treated to kill germs that might affect public health, and then the pollution is discharged into the nearest body of water, be it a river (which flows into the sea) or directly into the sea itself.

The theory behind this approach is the same as held by those fishers who believe that fish in the sea cyah done.

Short-sighted

There is a belief that the sea is infinite, and that its resources (like fish) are infinite, and that it doesn't matter what you put in it or how much you dump in it, the seawater will dilute it, and can keep on doing this forever and ever. Amen!

This is a very short-sighted and dangerous view. The sea is not infinite. It may be large - three-quarters of the earth's surface - and very deep in places, but it is finite. You cannot keep dumping toxic chemicals in the sea and expect them to be diluted into nothingness. The concept in chemistry of infinite dilution is a theoretical one. In reality, there is always some trace of what has been diluted.

Two years ago I attended a United Nations meeting in Cuba, where officials from Jamaica, Costa Rica, Colombia and Cuba discussed plans for cleaning up the four most polluted harbours in the Caribbean: Kingston, Puerto Limon, Cartagena and Havana Bay.

To my horror, the main issue was how long a pipe should be used to discharge the sewage in the Caribbean Sea. Yes, there was concern for coral reefs, and so the consensus was that the outfall pipes should discharge the sewage in deep enough water away from coral reefs.

More short-sightedness! Sewage dumped in deep water will be carried along to countries downstream, and will come to the surface and damage coral reefs there. And because of the Caribbean circular currents, will return to pollute the country from which it came. Yes, diluted. But getting more concentrated every day.

To our credit, at that meeting in Cuba, Jamaica was the only country that proposed tertiary treatment of sewage, treatment which would remove the nutrients and discharge effluent that would do little harm to our sensitive coral reefs. Jamaica proposes to establish a tertiary sewage treatment plant at Soapberry near to Riverton City which will have the capacity to replace all the existing malfunctioning and non-functioning sewage treatment plants in Kingston (including the Western and Greenwich plants built by the British before the 1938 riots which led to self-government).

To meet the needs of the Kingston Metropolitan Area in the year 2030 a plant with a capacity to treat 60 million gallons of sewage per day (mgd) will be required. According to the plan (which I have in my possession) a pilot plant to treat 5 mgd is to be built immediately to test the technology. In the meanwhile, dilution of pollution will be the solution. The construction of a 35 mgd plant is to begin 10 years later, and its expansion to 60 mgd will begin some 20 years after that. In the meanwhile, dilution of pollution will be the solution. By 2030 the system will be complete, and will for a fleeting moment be able to process all the sewage in Kingston. Then it will be inadequate, and dilution of pollution will again be the solution until a new plant is built.

Why take 10 years to test the Advance Integrated Ponding System (AIPS) technology which has been tried, tested and proven elsewhere in the world?

Hard decisions

Let us move straight away to the 35 mgd plant, and then to the 60 mgd plant, so that we can have a 90mgd plant by 2030, so to have excess capacity for the future!

But in the mean time, the concentration of pollutants in the sea is increasing daily, pollutants like heavy metals and pesticides deadly to humans, and nutrients deadly to coral reefs.

And although everyone nods their heads vigorously and agrees that pollution is a serious matter, no one seems inclined to take the hard decisions and find the money necessary to remedy the situation.

Dilution of pollution is, in fact, results in a dirty solution of sea water and pollutants. Dilution of pollution should not be considered as a solution to the problem of pollution, as it simply passes on the problem to future generations who will be given the task of cleaning up the seas polluted by us. Engineers take note!

Do you want this on your consciences?

Peter Espeut is a sociologist and is executive director of an environment and development NGO.


For more information, please contact:
Peter A. Espeut,
Executive Director,
Caribbean Coastal Area Management (CCAM) Foundation,
7 Lloyds Close,
Kingston 8
JAMAICA, W.I.
Fax: (876) 978-7641

Introduction Activities Publications Search
Wise Practices Regions Themes