| Environment
and development |
Dominica workshop papers
Wise
Coastal Management: Pollution Issues in Dominica
Terry
Raymond
As
Dominica moves to maturity as a nation state, her singular natural endowment
entrusts her with a responsibility to be a model of sustainable development for
small island states. While there
exist varying levels of environmental awareness and a mild degree of activism
among the general population, the environment has played and continues to play
an increasingly important role in Dominica’s development.
In
Dominica, the total length of coastline is approximately 153 km (95 miles), and
the area of the coastal shelf is approximately 715 square km (279 square miles).
The coastal shelf is relatively narrow, about 1 km (0.6 miles) wide on the west
coast, broadening to 5 km (3.1 miles) on the east coast in the Marigot area. The
coastal plain is also generally narrow, except in the Portsmouth area and the
northwest coast where the better beaches are found.
Because
of the volcanic nature of the island and the narrow coastal plain, the majority
of the beaches are narrow and consist of stone and black sand. Beaches in
Dominica are used by visitors and local residents for recreation, and for other
commercial purposes.
Dominica’s
tourism product is environmentally based, and it is endowed with a resource base
that distinguishes it from other ‘sun, sand and sea’ Caribbean destinations.
Dominica is ranked as one of the best dive destinations in the world.
It is therefore critical, after considering the above, that the country
protects its marine and coastal areas from contamination.
Contamination is defined as the input of materials into the
environment by man, at a rate, which exceeds the natural rate. Pollution results
when such inputs lead to the degradation of ecological or economic aspects of
the environment, and pose environmental health risks.
The quantification of pollution can be a costly and labour-intensive
undertaking. In Dominica, several institutions are involved in monitoring
pollution, mostly in terms of water quality and garbage disposal, these include
the Environmental Health Department, Dominica Solid Waste Management
Cooperation, and environmental organisations.
A number of villages along the coast of Dominica
continue to dump garbage into rivers and over the side of cliffs.
The garbage may then be moved along the coast by oceanic currents. This
has the potential for serious health problems for persons who use the coastal
areas for recreation and fishing, and for wildlife.
For the past five years, a number of government
and non-governmental organisations, and private sector agencies, have been
conducting beach clean up campaigns. One of the largest was the Beach and
Waterway Clean up Campaign undertaken in Dominica on October 21st
2000, which saw a record turnout of 2,029 volunteers, including 20 Scuba Divers.
Over 27,800 kg (61,100 lbs) of debris were collected along a
coastal/waterway distance of 113 km (70.5 miles), and including 35 communities.
Based on the coastal clean ups, the debris sources may be defined as follows:
| Land sources: 40%, littering by beach users; fishing; landfills; manufacturing plants; sewage; drains; streams and rivers. | ||
| Ocean sources: 19%, recreational boating, recreational fishing, commercial fishing, merchant vessels, cruise ships, military/research vessels. | ||
| General sources: 41%, many of the materials found could not be traced to a specific activity or source, so were classified in a ‘general’ category. |
The main pollution issues in Dominica’s coastal zone are:
| 1. | Siltation and sedimentation from general urban development, road construction, quarries, and deforestation. | |
| 2. | Chemical effluents from manufacturing plants (e.g. Belfast River, photo shops, hospitals). | |
| 3. | Organic inputs related to deforestation and agro-processing. | |
| 4. | Sewage effluents from urban and rural settlements. | |
| 5. | Solid waste and unregulated garbage disposal sites. |
The impacts of these forms of pollutions are:
| 1. | Suffocation of marine organisms, e.g. sponges and corals. | |
| 2. | Introduction of toxins into food chains. | |
| 3. | Increase of biological oxygen demand and mass die-off of organisms. | |
| 4. | Introduction of toxins, bacterial and viral infections. | |
| 5. | Polluted beaches. | |
| 6. | Uninhabitable coastal areas for wildlife. |
The deep waters surrounding Dominica are potential dumping sites and as such
surely seem a tempting solution to the problem of where to dispose of solid and
liquid waste. However, this would not be an ethical alternative for the
environment and its organisms. Furthermore, in view of the continued migration
of Dominicans from the interior of the island to the cities and coastal areas,
waste management will continue to be among the principal concerns of coastal
zone management.
The degradation of environmental health has
ecological as well as socio-economic consequences. A pro-active approach to the
avoidance of pollution is not only cost effective, but also represents an
investment in the health of the community.
The above picture paints a grim view of pollution
in Dominica. There is still a lot
of work to be done in getting citizens to realise that they must play their part
in ensuring that the environment will be preserved for future generations.
Possible solutions include:
| Increase the number of litter wardens in Dominica. | ||
| Increased police patrol of affected areas. | ||
| Enforcement of the Litter Act of 1997. | ||
| Education of bus drivers whose passengers dump garbage out of the widows and over cliff edges, and ensuring that each bus has a container for garbage disposal. | ||
| Training law enforcement officers. | ||
| Educational programmes in the communities and schools. | ||
| Improved garbage collection system island-wide, and equipping the Dominica Solid Waste Management Corporation with the necessary machinery and manpower. | ||
| Sorting of garbage into biodegradable and non-biodegradable categories. | ||
| Funding for local initiatives. |