| Environment
and development |
Dominica workshop papers
Encouraging
Coastal Stewardship in Nevis through the Establishment of a Social Contract
Lillith
Richards
Over
the past decade coastal developers and other users have expressed a growing
concern about the alarming rate of coastal erosion as well as the types of
activity being experienced on beaches. The
primary proponents of mitigating measures are property owners who have clearly
distinguished the marked change in the shoreline position and are now actively
seeking to mitigate coastal erosion with the most readily available measures.
As a result, in the period 1997-2000, several applications were
submitted for protective armouring, revetments and groynes in front of
developments on the northwest beaches. During
this time it was noticed however, that while revetments do protect
developments, they also cause significant erosion of land on either side of
them and may even result in the loss of the beach. Groynes, on the other hand,
did not protect property, but aided in the accretion of the beach up-drift of
the structure and erosion immediately down-drift of it.
While the outputs of these activities are not always desirable, the
willingness of developers to practice stewardship is commendable, however,
much assistance is needed to encourage their ‘good stewardship’.
General
users, namely those who utilise beaches for bathing, picnicking, fishing,
jogging etc., are not only concerned about beach erosion, but also about the
growing exclusiveness of these areas. Traditionally
beaches are used during vacation for family retreats but currently these areas
have been heavily marketed for tourism purposes and this has resulted in the
intrusion of coastal developments on sandy areas at certain locations.
As a result it has become very difficult for nationals to enjoy these
facilities as they once did, consequently, there is a growing concern that
Nevisans are being-planned-away from the coast.
Quite often these groups would file complaints about the developers to the respective government agency. Complaints filed are usually related to the introduction of armouring, clearing of land, sand mining, building development and waste disposal. While the last two activities are not frequent, they are all serious issues in need of urgent attention, and have not been dealt with due to the limitations of existing legislation.
Enabling
Good Stewardship
The need for better stewardship is becoming an increasingly important element for the proper management of coastal areas. However, in a small island such as Nevis, individuals are not always willing to report offenders to the relevant authority. As a result it may be easier to provide a mechanism aimed at seeking compliance rather than enforcement. This may prove to be more beneficial in this small island where the following are true:
| The majority of coastal lands are vested in the private sector. | ||
| Government activity is severely constrained by limited financial and human resources. | ||
| Legislative frameworks for the management of coastal lands are inadequate. | ||
| It is in the best interest of landowners to protect/conserve beachfront lands, as the cost of coastal lands is high (costs may exceed $US 49 per square metre / $US 45 per square yard), and the nature of the tourism industry provides owners with an excellent opportunity to engage in lucrative investment in the coastal zone. |
A
social contract for coastal land management is a viable option, as it provides
key stakeholders in the area with the opportunity to develop and establish
non-binding agreements for land management.
Developers themselves have already adopted a precautionary approach
where their activity on the coast is concerned.
Furthermore, community groups are informally monitoring and reporting
on coastal activities; this is an indication that people are ready for some
mechanism that would provide them with options best suited to their individual
needs.
In light of the limited success experienced with binding agreements, the exploration of non-binding mechanisms may provide us with the opportunity to adopt a new approach to deal with development conflict in the coastal zone. These mechanisms offer four main advantages:
| 1. | The formative process is not as lengthy or as costly; therefore stakeholder groups are likely to have a finished product in a much shorter time frame. | ||
| 2. | It is clear that a precautionary approach is necessary for the sustainable management of coastal lands and that many landowners are willing to adopt such an approach but the following essential elements are missing: | ||
| clear guidelines for activities on the coast; | |||
| an accepted advisory/arbitrating agency to serve as mediator for stakeholders in the area. | |||
| 3. | Non-binding agreements will generate a moral and political authority that may affect behaviour through the pressure of public opinion, and in so doing provide the same effect as a binding agreement. | ||
| 4. | Parties to such agreements are not pressured to fulfil each principle, only those that are of interest to their business; therefore compliance is likely. | ||
Framework for a Social Contract
A
social contract should be designed with the expressed needs and views of key
stakeholders. The contract should focus on a selected group of principles,
which could be in the form of accepted plans, actions, guidelines, or
memoranda, designed to address the needs of the following stakeholders:
| Coastal landowners. | ||
| Hotel owners and operators. | ||
| Department of Agriculture. | ||
| Nevis Historical and Conservation Society. | ||
| Nevis Fishermen Co-operative. | ||
| Department of Planning. | ||
| Department of Fisheries. | ||
| Tour guide operators. | ||
| Recreational users. | ||
| Beach bar operators. | ||
| Jessup’s Community Group. |
The
arbitrating body may be an organised group comprising both government and
non-governmental stakeholders, with the largest part being government
personnel. This arrangement is to facilitate monitoring and reporting as well
as to ensure that local government authorities, collectively the single
largest developer on the island, are encouraged to adopt a system for
voluntary commitment with other stakeholders groups, where the development of
coastal lands is concerned.
A
key factor in the preparation and implementation of a social contract is the
development of a social grouping capable of identifying their long-term and
short-term goals and the necessary measures needed to attain them.
The following existing constraints may introduce some difficulties in
the process:
| With the exception of beach monitoring data, very little comprehensive and collated scientific information is available for Nevis’ coastal areas. | ||
| The need for more creative, didactic encounters among stakeholders is often difficult to achieve due to preconceived educational methods. | ||
| The diverse interest of stakeholders may constrain efforts aimed at uniting groups under a single moral /social objective. |
A possible structured approach, designed to lessen anticipated tension and enable the smooth implementation of such a contract is as follows:
Possible organizational structure![]() |
Conclusion
The adoption of an organizational structure would enable the establishment of a social contract, wherein all key stakeholders would be meaningful partners in the management of coastal lands. This will ultimately lead to an improved system of coastal planning.