|
|
|

Online
chapter
Las sociedades originarias
(The Indigenous societies)
Director
Teresa Rojas Rabiela (Mexico)
Codirector
John V. Murra (United States of America)

Chapter 2: The Original Peopling of Latin
America
Alan L. Bryan
Early Adaptations to South American
Environments
Early sites reported in South America
will be reviewed by first looking at northern South America, and
then traversing the Andes before moving back north from Patagonia
to Northeast Brazil. It can be assumed that some coastally adapted
people expanding out of the forested Central American funnel turned
eastward along the Caribbean coast while other groups advanced southward
along the Pacific Coast. So far, little has been reported from eastern
Venezuela, the Guianas, or the Amazon Basin, mainly because it is
so difficult to find preceramic sites in densely forested regions.
Recently, however, two well-stratifed sites have been discovered
in the gallery forest along the Rio Orinoco in the Venezuela/Colombia
border region (Barse l990). Quartz crystal flakes, a hammerstone,
a ground stone axe fragment, and a nut cracking stone were associated
with a hearth that dated 9020 + l00 B. P. Other undated preceramic
localities have yielded flakes, flake scrapers, and two tanged projectile
points in later levels. The utilized flakes and flake scrapers are
thought to have been used to manufacture wood, cane, and bone artefacts.
A preliminary note (American Antiquity 53: l79) indicates
that the site of Taperinha, a large shellmound near the mouth of
the Tapajos River before it flows into the Amazon has yielded dates
back to l0,000 B. P. Although artefacts are not described, a report
on this site will be important because it will describe bone and
shell as well as stone artefacts
People expanding eastward from the
Darien region of Panama and Colombia soon ran out of dense tropical
forests and had to adapt to the semiarid thorn forests of north-eastern
Colombia and north-western Venezuela north of the northern terminus
of the Andes. The Pedregal River has a series of low terraces and
old higher surfaces with good exposures. The Venezuelan archaeologist
José Cruxent collected artifacts made of local quartzite from these
old surfaces. He discovered a possible technological sequence correlated
with the different levels. The highest level above the river yielded
large crude cores, scrapers, knives, and rough thick bifaces. The
next lower surface yielded smaller, thinner bifaces in addition
to the early types. On terrace l, thick willow-leaf-shaped projectile
points were added to older types. The thick biconvex points, obviously
shaped to fit into socketed hafts like a cylindrical bone or wood
point, were termed El Jobo after the nearly country store. Finally,
the floodplain terrace yielded small tanged points with constricted
bases (Rouse and Cruxent l963,
fig. 5 and plate 3). The hypothetical topological sequence, which
might be expected if knappers were experimenting with stone as a
useful material for tipping wooden spears, remains undated. Acting
upon his hunch that the El Jobo points were used to hunt large mammals,
Cruxent joined a paleontological team excavating bones of mastodons
and other extinct animals at the Muaco waterhole near the coast
east of Coro. Much to his delight he found El Jobo points at Muaco,
but also more recent artifacts; so it was clearly not possible to
prove that El Jobo points had been used to kill mastodons at Muaco.
Nevertheless, a fossil bone that evidently had been incised in a
patterned way before permineralization was recovered at Muaco (Rouse
and Cruxent l963, plate 4A), and burned bone from the site was
dated 16,870 B. P. (Rouse and Cruxent
l963: 35-36).
Encouraged by these finds, Cruxent
searched for better sites where upwelling water might not have mixed
materials. Two fossiliferous localities were found a few kilometres
east, but one of these was a stream bed so it was concluded the
El Jobo points and horse bones could have been introduced into the
gravel deposit from different original contexts.
The more extensive Taima-Taima site
is neither a waterhole nor a streambed, although artesian water
does seep horizontally from the San Luis Mountains and flows through
ancient beach sands beneath a bed of coquina containing Miocene
fossils. Gradually the saturated sand caused the coquina to settle
and crack. Water seeping through the cracks redeposited old beach
sand onto the coquina pavement. The top of the pavement blocks were
smoothed by the moving sand, but the water pressure was never strong
enough to roll the pavement blocks. Animals, mostly mastodons, were
attracted by water that pooled on the pavement in the grey sand.
Early people were also attracted to the site, because Cruxent found
El Jobo points in intimate association with mastodon bones, and
one inside a pelvic cavity.
Several years after Cruxent's initial
excavations, confirmatory excavations in l976 recovered a broken
El Jobo point inside the pubic cavity of a partially disarticulated
and butchered young mastodon whose bones had been cut, probably
using a jasper flake found adjacent to the left ulna of the beast.
The heavy bones had not been moved by water action, only by man.
Preserved by constant wetness, a nearby concentration of twigs,
evidently chewed by the mastodon and presumably part of its stomach
contents, provided dates from several radiocarbon laboratories that
indicated that the young mastodon had been slain and butchered about
13,000 B. P. (Bryan,
et al. l978; Ochsenius and Gruhn l979; Gruhn and Bryan l984).
The new dates confirmed most dates that had been obtained earlier
on different materials from the grey sand. Eventually a soil developed
on the grey sand, and horses and glyptodonts lived on this later
surface, but evidently the mastodons had become extinct. Colluvium
then accumulated and another paleosol developed on another surface.
Mor colluvium was covered by an organic black muck, which yielded
dates around l0,000 B. P. The entire depositional sequence was capped
by sterile colluvium. No artifacts were found in any deposit above
the grey sand, so the artifacts could not have intruded from above.
Despite claims to the contrary (e.g.,
Lynch l990), Taima-Taima
has yielded definite artifacts in a well-dated, deeply stratified
geological context which remained saturated with seeping water that
moved sand and concentrated twigs into pockets, but was not strong
enough to move or mix bones or stone artifacts. Reported in great
detail, the data constitute the only solid evidence for a megamammal
kill site anywhere in South America. Of course, if one accepts the
model that North American big game hunters were the earliest South
Americans, the evidence from Taima-Taima or any other site earlier
than Clovis cannot be correct, and all such sites must be explained
away, as Lynch (l990)
has systematically attempted to do.
Significant differences between the
archaeology of North and South America now become evident. North
American archaeologists looking for cultural origins naturally look
back to Beringia and Siberia; and it is quite easy to find similarities
and relationships because people adapted to the Great Plains and
the steppe tundra of Beringia and Siberia lived in ecosystems that
required an emphasis on hunting as opposed to collecting. South
American archaeologists naturally look back to Panama and Central
America for cultural origins, but the dominant ecosystem in that
region is tropical forest, and the only relationships that have
been recognized are the widely scattered fishtail and Clovis-like
fluted points. Archaeologists oriented toward North America thus
conclude that fluted points must constitute the earliest relationships.
Unlike fluted points, which have a widespread distribution because
many cultural groups found them to be effective hunting weapons,
El Jobo points have a very limited known distribution. Although
willow-leaf-shaped points are known from Costa Rica, Nicaragua,
and Mexico, they are not distinctive El Jobo points. Characteristic
thick biconvex points like El Jobo have been collected from a site
in north-western Argentina (Alberto Rex Gonzalez, personal communication,
l970), and one was recovered in southern Chile at the contemporary
13,000 year old occupation site at Monte Verde to be summarized
below. Future work, especially along the unknown eastern slopes
of the Andes, may reveal a linkage between these widely separated
occurrences; but it is also possible that the nearly cylindrical
shape of El Jobo points was transferred from similarly shaped ground
bone or wooden points in several parts of South America. A major
difference between North and South America is the greater diversity
in lithic assemblages which developed locally in South America as
part of distinctive cultural adaptations to different ecosystems
containing a wide and diverse range of natural resources. Technological
convergence, including bifacial points with similar shapes, may
be expected to occur as parallel adaptations to similar environmental
and resource bases (Bryan
1973; Richardson
l978).
In central Colombia, almost l000 km
Southwest of Taima-Taima on the high Sabana de Bogotá, excavations
in the El Abra rock shelters yielded a simple core and minimally
retouched flake industry dated as early as 12,400 B. P. (Correal
l986). The Abriense industry was also found at the open Tibitó
site in association with remains of mastodons and horses but mainly
deer in a context dated 11,740 B. P. (Correal
l981). Tibitó may have been a processing station and not a kill
site; but nevertheless the absence of any evidence of bifacial points,
even broken, seems significant. These people probably killed their
game with wooden spears, as did the occupants of Monte Verde, Chile,
and as still do many lowland South American forest Indians. It is
to be expected that Abriense people sometimes obtained bifacial
points as trade items, but evidently these hunter/gatherers did
not regularly use bifacially flaked stone projectile points on the
Sabana de Bogotá, even into ceramic times.
The story near the equator in highland
Ecuador is different. The region around Ilaló east of Quito contains
abundant quantities of excellent obsidian, which attracted people
at least by ll,000 B. P. Excavations at El Inga yielded several
types of bifacial points, including fishtail fluted and unfluted
forms; however, disappointingly late radiocarbon dates between 4,000
and 9,000 B. P. were obtained (Mayer-Oakes
l986). Excavations at the nearby San José site by the American
archaeologist William Mayer-Oakes yielded a similar industry, including
blades, burins, and many carefully retouched unifacially flaked
tools, but no evidence of bifacial flaking at all (William
Mayer-Oakes, personal communication l990). A stratigraphically
consistent series of obsidian hydration dates between 10,000 and
11,000 B. P. suggests that the earliest known occupants of the Ilaló
region innovated an advanced flaked stone industry that lacked bifacial
flaking only after l0,000 years ago. The idea of bifacial flaking
was probably adopted when the Magellanic fishtail form diffused
in from the south. Somewhat later the concept of fluting was accepted
from the north and applied to fishtail points.
But Magellanic fishtail points are
not ubiquitous farther south in the Andes, and they do not form
a convenient horizon marker. In fact, they have a very spotty known
distribution with gaps even at sites well dated to the time they
should occur if the idea was passed from group to group. Rather,
it seems that several projectile point styles were experimented
with by different groups between 13,000 and 10,000 years ago, while
other groups like those living on the Sabana de Bogotá never adopted
the idea of bifacially flaked points at all, even though they hunted
large mammals in a grassland environment. Unlike North America,
where popular point styles became widely distributed, most South
Americans continued to use functional technology that worked for
them.
For instance, the earliest occupants
of Pachamachay, a small rock shelter located at 4000 m on the high
puna of central Peru, used a squat triangular point type to hunt
vicuñas (Rick l980:149, fig. 7.1).
By 9000 B. P. these people, who also hunted smaller game and gathered
tubers and fruits, had switched to a peculiar willow leaf-shaped
form with projecting bilateral spurs near the base, and stayed with
that form for thousands of years. Evidently, these hunters successfully
managed the vicuña herds to maintain their population, but began
to herd the animals only about 4,000 years ago. The triangular points
came from deposits dated 11,800 + 930 B. P., a date which Rick
(l980:65) at first accepted, but later (Rick
l988) cast doubt upon because of the large statistical error
and the 2,500 year gap in time before the next occupation.
The story is quite different only l00
km north near Lake Lauricocha, the headwaters of the Rio Marañon.
The first people who occupied Lauricocha Cave about 9500 years ago,
immediately after glacial ice melted from the region, used abundant
flakes, many with unifacial marginal retouch, as scrapers and points
for hunting the Andean deer. Bone and antler points, identified
by the excavator as daggers or awls, were more common artifacts
(Cardich l978: 298). Bifacially
retouched triangular and simple willow-leaf-shaped projectile points
were used between 8,000 and 5,000 B. P., when people hunted more
camelids than deer. The evidence from the high puna of central Peru
indicates that neighbouring groups of people used different projectile
point styles at the same time.
The possibility that bone points evolved
into stone points at Lauricocha should be considered as an hypothesis
which would explain local independent developments of bifacially
flaked stone projectile points. Comparison of the early flaked triangular
points at Pachamachay and Lauricocha with two ground bone triangular
points recovered from beneath a massive rockfall in Pikimachay,
a large rock shelter overlooking the Ayacucho Valley in southern
Peru, suggests that a similar point form could easily have been
transferred to a harder material when knappers familiar with simple
marginal retouch experimented with retouching all edges on both
sides to create a point that would penetrate thick hides more effectively
than bone or antler points.
Pikimachay has become one of the more
controversial sites in South America because evidence suggests that
the shelter was occupied as early as 21,000 years ago.
However, as the flaked stones from
the early deposits are of the same volcanic tuff as the cave wall,
it is conceivable that roof spalls could have flaked when they struck
the cave floor. Bones of extinct animals, mainly sloth, also appear
to have been cut and worked, but this could also be ascribed to
falling rocks. Nevertheless, unworked exotic pebbles which must
be manuports have also been recovered from the same deposits. Although
the equivocal unifacially flaked stones are found throughout the
lower deposits, there can be no question that the triangular bone
points from higher in the pre-roof fall deposits, which have been
dated 14,150 + 180 B. P. (MacNeish,
et al: 309, fig 8-l; l98l),are artifacts because the grinding
marks are readily visible with the naked eye. One would have to
suppose that several definite flake tools, and the ground bone points,
all part of the Ayacucho Complex, were all intruded through the
sterile layer of roof fall, a possibility that seems remote by the
Canadian project geologist, Nathaniel Rutter (personal communication,
l99l). Unifacial flake points were also described as part of the
Ayacucho Complex; but the earliest biface, a rather crude percussion
flaked bipoint, was found above the roof fall. Three broken points
identified as "fishtail" appeared sometime after 11,000
B.P. (MacNeish, et al.
l980). The reported evidence from Pikimachay makes sense if
it is assumed that the earliest general hunter/gatherers carried
with them an unspecialized unifacial flaked stone technology that
embodied the potential to innovate bifacial points either by local
experimentation or by external stimulus.
Although the earliest dated sites in
western South America have been found on the puna where camelids
abound and tubers can be collected, several localities have been
found on or near the Pacific Coast that are more significant because
of their artefacts content than their age. Shellfish, seabirds,
fish, sea and land mammals, components of productive ecosystems
especially at the mouths of rivers along the arid Pacific Coast,
were exploited at least as early as l0,500 B. P. Significantly,
the technology associated with these early coastal sites does not
contain bifacially flaked artifacts, which would be expected if
their immediate ancestors had been specialized big game hunters
who occupied the high Andes.
On the arid Santa Elena Peninsula in
Ecuador, Stothert (l985) reports on the Las Vegas culture, which
is fully developed by l0,000 B. P., and earlier dates indicate its
roots extend back another millennium. Shell, charcoal and human
bone yielded stratigraphically consistent dates between 6,600 and
l0,840 B. P. Artifacts include a unifacial flake industry lacking
any formal types, although hammerstones, edge ground pebbles, and
two ground stone axes were found. Bone points and a spatula may
have been used for making nets or textiles. Scoops, dishes, and
other containers were shaped of shell. The abundant industry of
utilized but minimally retouched flakes and chunks suggests the
manufacture of tools and equipment from wood, bamboo, reeds, and
bark. Las Vegas is interpreted as an early tropical forest tradition
which included some horticulture; and gave rise to the early ceramic
Valdivia culture with intensive agriculture, an expanded fishing
technology, and more developed ceremonialism after 5300 B. P.
The Talara tarseeps in extreme north-western
Peru is a well-known Late Pleistocene paleontological locality.
Nearby on the same marine platform, clusters of unifacial choppers,
"horse-hoof" scrapers, denticulates, and utilized flakes
were mapped and analyzed (Richardson
l978). Associated shells of large mollusks, Anadara, evidently
carried up from distant mangrove swamps, yielded dates of 11,200
and 8125 B. P. Probably the unifacial artifacts were used to work
wood, bone, and fibres. With the addition of ground stone axes,
mortars, and bowls, a similar industry continued to be used at the
mouth of the nearby Siches River until at least 5500 B. P.
People adapted to the semiarid coast
of the Santa Elena Peninsula and northern Peru evidently never found
a need for bifacial points, although their absence seems strange
if they had recently been big game hunters in the Andes. However,
less than 500 km farther south, in the region around the Moche Valley,
mastodons evidently were killed by hunters with distinctive large
tanged Paiján points, which are known only from this limited coastal
region, although a few similar forms were found at El Inga. In a
sealed context in the small Quirihuac rockshelter, ten broken Paiján
points and thousands of flakes were recovered. Four dates on wood
and charcoal ranged from 12,795 to 8,645 B. P., while human bones
dated 9,930 and 9,020 B. P. (Ossa l978). The open site of La Cumbre
yielded Paiján points in association with mastodon bones that dated
l2,360 and l0,535 B. P. As the dates were so variable, they were
averaged to yield l0,796 B. P., as compared with an average of l0,650
for Quirihuac. It is believed that the Paiján Complex existed between
11,000 and l0,000 years ago, when the people gradually abandoned
Paiján points but continued to emphasize the maritime economy that
they probably pursued during a seasonal round (Richardson
l989).
In southern Peru, near Ilo, marine
resources were being utilized intensively by l0,500 B. P. A ring-shaped
shellmound yielded a bone harpoon, bone and shell fishhooks, and
modified shells, along with a unifacial flake industry, but no bifaces,
in deposits dated between l0,570 and 7670 B. P. (Richardson
l989). Mollusks, near shore fish, sea mammals, and bird remains
were identified; but terrestrial mammals were absent.
Most likely, the reason a fully developed
maritime adaptation was present on the Pacific Coast of South America
by l0,500 B. P. and in California by l0,000 B. P., but not on the
Atlantic Coast until after 8,000 B. P. is because sections of the
Pacific Coast are tectonically rising, whereas the Atlantic Coast
is stable. Thus, Las Vegas, Siches, and the Ring site all represent
well established maritime adaptations which, like their contemporaries
in southern California, happen to be the earliest locally preserved
sites representative of more ancient coastal adaptations, remnants
of which should be found by underwater archaeologists working on
the continental shelves of all coasts. This interpretation implies
that inland sites in the western cordilleras were first occupied
by people who gradually expanded inland from the coasts as they
adapted their economies to the utilization of terrestrial animals
and plants. At first these explorers simply incorporated the resources
of the adjacent interior regions in their annual round; but eventually
some people, as at Pachamachay, developed a technology capable of
adapting to year-round terrestrial ecosystems (Dillehay
l989a). Two sites in central Chile have yielded artifacts with
extinct animals. Quereo, located on a bluff now overlooking the
Pacific, yielded simple unifacial flaked tools associated with mastodon,
horse, extinct camelid, deer, and sea mammal bones in addition to
marine shells in a context dated 11,500 years ago (Dillehay
l989b). Evidently these coastal people were experimenting with
interior ecosystems. Tagua-Tagua, farther inland in the central
valley south of Santiago, is situated on a lake shore which attracted
game (mastodons, horses, camelids, and aquatic birds) and hunters
who left flakes, cores, hammerstones, and some bone tools in a stratum
dated between 11,430 and 11,000 B. P. (Montané l968).
At Monte Verde, about 900 km farther
south in the subantarctic rain forest and 15 km inland from the
northernmost fjord, a boggy locality has revealed superbly preserved
perishable artifacts in a context dated around 13,000 B. P. (Dillehay
l989a, l986).
The earliest known architecture in the Americas, at least ten semi-rectangular
hut foundations made of roughly modified wooden logs held in place
by wooden stakes; wooden mortars containing well-preserved seeds,
fruits, and stalks of edible plants were directly associated with
grinding stones. Wooden artifacts and a few unifacial flaked stone
tools were found near small clay-lined hearths within the structures,
and larger hearths were located outside the entranceways of these
houses aligned along Chinchihuapi Creek. Monte Verde was a planned
settlement with different activity areas for food preparation, tool
production, and evidently even medical treatment. As plant remains
were found which ripen in all seasons, it was concluded that the
settlement was permanent. The presence of floral remains native
to the ocean shores, the high mountains, and even Patagonia, indicate
relations with other ecosystems, probably including trade. The presence
of two large bifaces, and an El Jobo-like point of exotic materials
probably were obtained through trade connections. Otherwise the
lithic industry is composed of simple flakes and stones with naturally
sharp edges, some of which were hafted onto wooden handles. The
working edges of these carefully selected stones show clear traces
of use (Dillehay and
Collins l986). Grooved bolas stones and a wooden spear with
a fire hardened tip were probably used to hunt extinct camelids
and smaller game. Mastodon bones may have been collected as useful
objects, although possibly people killed mired animals.
The final report on the artifacts from
Monte Verde will give a clearer picture of the total material culture
used by early hunter/gatherers. Test excavation across the creek
in older sediments yielded several fractured stones, LL of which
show clear percussion scars and/or use wear on their edges, in direct
association with three hearth-like features that yielded dates of
about 33,000 B. P. (Dillehay
and Collins l988).
Many sites dated after 8500 B. P. have
been excavated on the Chilean coast. These people collected shellfish,
fished, and hunted sea mammals and birds, sometimes with bifacial
willow-leaf-shaped and stemmed points. Some of these groups, especially
in the arid north, moved upriver seasonally to hunt terrestrial
animals and collect plants for food and medicine; however, most
groups occupying the formerly glaciated south coast moved seasonally
to various coastal localities. It has always been assumed that these
Archaic maritime cultures had developed from earlier Paleo-Indian
hunting cultures that used bifacially flaked stone projectile points,
although the early evidence from Las Vegas, Talara, and the Ring
site suggests that a general hunting/gathering economy had been
followed in coastal zones before the innovation of bifacial points.
The evidence from Monte Verde, Tagua-Tagua, Quereo, and Paiján suggests
that early people living on or near the coast utilized all sizes
of readily procurable game animals whether or not they used bifacial
points. With this interpretation, the North American terms Paleo-Indian
and Archaic, as well as their implied sequence, are clearly inapplicable
in South America.
East of the Andes, people are known
to have been on Tierra del Fuego, at the southern extremity of the
Americas using a non-diagnostic unifacial flaked stone assemblage
at least by 10,400 B. P. (Orquera
l987). The earliest documented evidence of occupation of Patagonia
is at Los Toldos, Cave 3 in interior southern Argentina, were the
lowest cultural layer, Level LL, was dated 12,600 + 600 B. P. (Cardich
l978; Orquera l987). Scrapers, knives, projectile points, and
utilized flakes, all unifacially retouched, were found with bones
of guanacos, extinct camelids, and horses. About 11,000 B. P. the
shelter was reoccupied by the Toldense people, who used similar
unifacial tools, with the addition of sub-triangular bifacial points
and knives, as well as bone awls and spatulas, all associated with
horse and guanaco bones. Toldense people left the region about 8750
B. P.; but people emphasizing unifacially retouched blades, scrapers,
knives, and denticulates occupied the cave after 7260 B. P. Evidently
these people used bolas rather than bifacial points to hunt guanacos.
Fell's Cave, in Chile north of the
Straits of Magellan, is the type site for Magellanic fishtail points,
two of which have long basal thinning scars. End and side scrapers
were also recovered with broken and burned horse bones and many
butchered guanaco bones in layers dated between 11,000 and l0,000
B. P. The subsequent occupation, dated between 9l00 and 8l00 B.
P., reportedly lacked bifacial points. Bone points may have been
used to hunt guanacos. Short triangular bifacial points and bolas
stones were found in the third occupation dated between 8180 and
6560 B. P. The triangular points and overlapping dates suggest some
relationship with Toldense (Orquera
l987), although the lack of fishtail points in Argentine Patagonian
sites of similar age remains a puzzle. Unlike North America, it
seems that standardized projectile point styles were not widely
adopted by contemporary groups. However, far to the north in central
Buenos Aires Province, fishtail points were excavated from two nearby
sites in contexts dated between l0,800 and l0,600 B. P. (Flegenheimer
l987). The only identified bone was an extinct armadillo scute.
Another locality in the region is apparently a workshop where fishtail
points were shaped, one by grinding rather than flaking. Given the
absence of kill sites, it is difficult to make a case for an early
specialized hunting horizon simply from the known distribution of
fishtail points in the southern cone (Orquera
l987: 354).
Extinct glyptodon and guanaco bones
were found with many exotic quartz flakes not far away at La Moderna.
A bone collagen date of 6550 B. P. on the glyptodon has been questioned
because it implies late persistence of extinct fauna (Orquera
l987). However, Arroyo Seco in the southern part of Buenos Aires
Province, has produced even greater surprises concerning extinct
fauna. Bifacial triangular points occur with unifacial artifacts
in an undated component. Below that stratum, a few tools with only
unifacial marginal retouch were found associated with guanaco, deer,
horse, and giant ground sloth bones. Beneath this occupation level
and with no evidence of intrusion through the zone yielding the
megafauna, were found human burials with red ochre, perforated shell
and teeth beads, and a glyptodon scute. The suggestion that people
maintained a graveyard while giant ground sloths and giant armadillo-like
glyptodons were still living in the area appears to be confirmed
by almost identical radiocarbon dates of about 8500 B. P. on sloth
and human bones (Fidalgo, et al. l986). Certainly there is no evidence
to support a model that big game hunters with a specialized technology
had much effect on the Pampan fauna.
In southern Brazil, fishtail points
are generally associated with more recent sites, although some stemmed
points may be as early as 7,000 to 8,000 B. P. (Schmitz
l987: 90). In fact, the only reported evidence for big game
hunting in the savannah/parkland areas of Rio Grande do Sul are
modified ground sloth bones, one of which yielded a date of 12,770
+ 220 B. P. (Bombin and Bryan l978;
Schmitz l987, fig. 14). Later people occupying this savannah/parkland
region along the Rio Uruguai hunted deer and collected pitted fruits
between 11,000 and 8,500 B. P. These hunter/gatherers used bifacially
flaked stemmed points, bifacial knives, and a variety or flake scrapers,
pounding stones, and anvil stones (Schmitz
l987).
Along the Altoparaná in northeaster
Argentina, eastern Paraguay, and south-western Brazil, a distinctive
percussion flaked bifacial industry appeared sometime after 8,000
B. P. and lasted into protohistoric times. The large heavy bifaces,
often looking like Old World handaxes and cleavers, led to the hypothesis
that this industry was early and ultimately derived by diffusion
from the Old World; however, apparently it was simply a local adaptation
to a dense tropical forest ecosystem by hunters and collectors.
Artifacts recovered include picks, scrapers, knives, heavy choppers
and cleavers, but no bifacial projectile points.
Farther Northeast in the forested interior
of the State of Sao Paulo, at the Alice Boër site near the city
of Rio Claro, a unifacial core scraper and an end/side scraper
were recovered with several flakes
on the surface of an alluvial gravel beneath a thick sterile alluvium.
Unifacial artifacts and flakes were found throughout the clayey
sand above the sterile alluvium. Tanged bifacial points appeared
near the middle of the stratum and continued to the top. A small
charcoal sample from the middle of the stratum yielded a date of
14,200 + 1150 B. P., and a burned chert flake from above this sample
yielded a thermoluminescence date of 10,970 B. P., below charcoal
dates which clustered around 6,000 B. P. (Bryan
and Beltrão l978; Beltrão, et
al. l986; Hurt l986). Evidence from Alice Boër suggesting that
bifacial points were innovated as early as 14,000 years ago, earlier
than anywhere else in the New World, must be confirmed at other
sites; however, the presence of stratigraphically early unifacial
artifacts seems to confirm the early dates in Rio Grande do Sul.
Farther Southwest in Sao Paulo State,
but still on the Planalto, a series of occupation settlements, including
open sites and rockshelters have been dated between 9,800 and 10,500
B. P. (Collet l985). Shells of
giant land snails are the most abundant animal remains, although
bones of tapir, deer, peccary, monkeys, small rodents, turtles and
fish indicate a diversified hunting and collecting economy. Amorphous
unifacial flake tools and pebble choppers were found, but bifacial
points were absent. Ground mammal and bird bone points were used
as projectile points. Flexed burials, one of which was dated 98l0
+_ 150 B. P., were placed in the occupation layers. The fact that
these hunter/gatherers did not use bifacial points while their contemporaries
to the Northwest and south used finely retouched tanged and stemmed
bifacial points indicates that bifacial point styles were not widely
adopted. Possibly these people seasonally climbed onto the Planalto
from the coast where bifacial points were always very rare.
Shell mounds (sambaquis) were once
common the coast from Rio Grande do Sul to Espirito Santo State
north of Rio de Janeiro, although very few of them were excavated
carefully before they were destroyed for construction materials.
The largest sambaquis, more than 20 m high, were in the States of
Santa Catarina, Paraná, and Sao Paulo, where there are many headlands,
bays, inlets and estuaries which protected shellfish beds as well
as the shellmounds from ocean swells. Because the Atlantic coast
is quite stable, the gradually rising sea level reached its maximum
after about 8,000 BP, so the submerged bases of the oldest known
sambaquis, such as Maratuá near Santos, are dated after 7800 B.
P. (Laming-Emperaire
l968: 93-94). Most sambaquis date after 6,000 BP and had been
abandoned before the introduction of ceramics in late prehistoric
times. Flaked stone is usually rare; amorphous quartz flakes were
used for cutting and scraping. Large percussion flaked bifaces were
sometimes shaped as preforms for ground axes (Bryan
l978). Pecked axes, chisels, mortars, netsinkers, pounders and
hammerstones, often with pecked depressions for cracking palm nuts,
also occur. Zooliths, beautifully polished stone representations
of animals were reportedly associated with burials, but none have
been properly excavated. Bone was used for projectile points, fish
hooks, fish gorges, spatulas, beads, and pendants. Whalebone was
made into braziers, containers, and other tools, including clubs
and spindle whorls. Mammal and shark teeth were perforated for suspension;
and shell was used for ornaments, knives, scrapers, and containers.
Because of the preponderance of shells
relative to artifacts, the impression is gained that the occupants
mainly gathered shellfish; however, the abundance of fish, and sea
and land mammal bones in many sambaquis indicates that the people
were very successful general hunters and gatherers. Nevertheless,
huge sections of shellmounds often yield very few artifacts, an
unattractive situation for archaeologists, so sambaquis were often
ignored. But shellmounds are very significant because if it were
not for preservation of the relatively abundant bone and shell artifacts,
the few amorphous flakes and occasional hammerstone with pecked
depressions (quebra cocos), coastal occupation sites may have gone
unrecognized; and we would have had a very biased view of the prehistory
of the productive Atlantic coastal zone, which was well populated
in early historic times.
Future search by underwater archaeologists
in protected and resource rich bays, lagoons, and estuaries should
reveal older submerged sambaquis, possibly some containing waterlogged
perishable materials.
Limestone caves and rockshelters have
been excavated in the forested interior of the State of Minas Gerais
since early in the last century. The original purpose was to procure
bones of the Pleistocene fauna; however, human bones and artifacts
were also recovered. The Danish palaeontologist, Wilhelm Lund, excavated
many caves near Lagoa Santa, north of the city of Belo Horizonte.
He concluded that the majority of human remains had been deposited
long after the extinct ground sloths, mastodons, and other animals,
except at one site where he found fossilized human bones in apparent
association with extinct mammal bones. The human skulls from Sumidouro
Cave, later studied by Pöch (l938), included some with heavy browridges,
a feature that is absent on the later skeletons ("Lagoa Santa
man") excavated by Lund and others. About the time of Pöch's
study, other less well controlled excavations were carried out in
Lund's and other caves in the area. The animal and human bones from
these excavations were stored in crates in the State University
in Belo Horizonte. Examination of the contents of the crates in
l970 revealed evidence of human workmanship (chopping) on a few
fossil bones (Prous l986),
but also a human calotte with features similar to those included
in Pöch's study except that the browrideges were even more pronounced
(Bryan l978, figs.
7-12; Beattie and Bryan 1984). The calotte was misplaced before
it could be studied properly, although the similar state of permineralization
and the morphological features suggest that it came from Sumidouro
Cave. The calotte may or may not date to the Pleistocene. Populations
with heavy browridges are known elsewhere in the Americas from Holocene
contexts. The calotte is significant not so much because it may
be old but because it suggests that a transitional form of early
Homo sapiens was present in America as well as in east Asia.
In fact, the closest morphological similarities are with transitional
Homo Sapiens in China and Australia.
Excavations by the French archaeologist,
Annette Laming-Emperaire, in Lapa Vermelha IV, a large rock shelter
in the Lagoa Santa region, finally confirmed the association of
extinct fauna with human remains. Scattered bones of a giant ground
sloth were recovered from a fissure at the rear of the cave, and
human bones of the Lagoa Santa type without heavy browridges were
found below in a level dated LL,600 and l0,200 B. P. (Laming-Emperaire,
et al. l975; Prous l986a; Prous l986b). Minimally retouched
quartz flakes and cores were excavated from a statum dated 22,400
in the main part of the cave, while a unifacially retouched side
scraper came from just above charcoal dated >25,000 B. P. Excavations
farther north in Minas Gerais yielded several quartz crystal flakes
and red ochre associated with an extensive hearth dated 11,960 +
250 B. P. in the Gran Abrigo de Santana do Riacho (Prous
l986a; l986b).
Many other caves and rockshelters have
been excavated in Minas Gerais, Goias, and Bahia, although only
preliminary and summary reports have been published. Some of these
caves have yielded worked fossil bones of mastodon, sloth, and horse;
but the lack of collagen in the bone has precluded radiocarbon dating.
Charcoal dates on later levels are available back to about l0,000
B. P. The flaked stone industry from these caves is always unifacial.
In fact, except for the occasional exotic trade item, the flaked
stone technology remained unifacial until ceramics were adopted
in the late First Millennium A. D. In most areas, shaped flaked
stone artifacts are rare and late; however, in southern Goias a
distinctive unifacially shaped limace (lesma in Portuguese) appeared
between about 11,000 and 9,000 B. P. associated with unifacial choppers,
knives, scrapers, and perforators. Heavy wear on one edge near one
end suggests that the lesmas were used as scrapers (Schmitz,
et al. l976; l989). Small and medium-sized mammals, reptiles,
and birds, as well as fish and freshwater mollusks
were hunted, presumably with wooden
spears, or gathered along with palm nuts, that were broken open
with hammerstones containing pecked depressions on the sides. In
the semiarid region of southern Piauí, several rock shelters at
the base of a metamorphosed sandstone escarpment have been excavated
near Sao Raimundo Nonato by a Franco-Brazilian team. The original
intent was to date the rock art on the rear walls, but extensive
and deeply buried evidences of occupation altered the prime objective,
and there is now a research institute and a museum which is attracting
tourists to the town (Guidon l986;
Delibrias
and Guidon l986; Delibrias,
et al. l989; Parenti, et al.
1990). The Toca do Sitio do Meio was extensively tested in l978
and l980, but roof fall, consisting of large boulders, has prevented
excavation of the lower layers. Nevertheless, pebble core choppers
and unifacial flake tools were found associated with hearths dated
14,300, 13,900, 12,440, and 12,200 B. P.
Between l978 and l988, major excavations
were carried out at the nearby Toca do Boqueirão da Pedra Furada
because the roof of this large rock shelter collapsed only in front,
creating a lip mound or rampart which would have screened occupants
from view by anyone in the valley 20 m below. An alluvial fan, composed
of quartz pebbles eroded from a formation high on the cliff face,
has built up at one corner of the shelter. This fan contained a
ready source of flakeable pebbles, although exotic quartzite pebbles
were also found on several occupation floors, and chert was added
in the upper layers. Except for one exotic bifacial point in an
upper layer, the entire flaked stone industry is unifacial. Flake
scrapers, notched flakes, pointed pebbles, pebble choppers, and
hammerstones were identified, in addition to many cores and unretouched
flakes, which are workshop detritus. A few artifacts examined under
a scanning electron microscope revealed evidence of use striations,
so the site is much more than simply a quarry/workshop where people
also drew pictures on the walls.
The original objective of dating the
rock art was successful. A sandstone wall spall bearing traces of
red paint was found directly associated with a hearth dated 17,000
+ 400 B. P. Extensive beds of charcoal, similar to hearths found
elsewhere in Brazilian caves where people evidently dragged in limbs
and logs to keep fires burning overnight, were found from near the
surface to almost five m deep. The earliest people broke up some
boulders with fire and rearranged them to make level areas for rock-lined
hearths. Charcoal from this early horizon has been dated 41,000,
42,400 and 47,000 B. P. More than a dozen stratigraphically
consistent radiocarbon dates on hearths built on later occupation
floors have been dated between 32,160 and 6,100 B. P. The problem
of the lack of bone preservation in the sandstone shelters has been
overcome by excavations in nearby limestone caves, where bones of
many Pleistocene animals have been recovered in addition to the
fragment of a highly permineralized and thick-walled human calotte
(Guérin l99l), study of which
may help confirm the calotte from Lagoa Santa.
Announcement of these dates in preliminary
reports has created consternation among North American archaeologists
who have accepted the model that the Clovis people were the earliest
Americans. None of these sceptic have visited the site, but they
feel secure in their conviction that the artifacts must be naturefacts,
the hearths are really from forest fires (e.g., Lynch
l990), and even that the excavators are inadequately trained
(Fagan l990b).
Probably only a final report on the evidence from these sites will
finally quell the controversy.
In the end these and all other sites
dated as early as or earlier than Clovis will force rejection of
the currently popular "Clovis-first" model and acceptance
of an alternative explanatory model that does not have to explain
away much of the actual reported archaeological data found throughout
South, Central, and North America. Such a model would allow east
Asians with a general hunting/fishing/gathering economy and a simple
unifacial flaked stone technology gradually to expand their territory
around the Northwest Pacific onto the unglaciated Bering Land Bridge,
and then down the Northwest Coast of North America before it finally
became glaciated. People with a maritime orientation would have
stayed along the coast, although some groups would have budded off
and moved up unglaciated river valleys, which would also provide
productive ecosystems for general hunters and gatherers. Eventually,
in a few open grassland areas which supported herds of herbivores
having predictable habits but few edible vegetal foods, some people
moving inland from the coasts and rivers would experiment with more
effective methods for obtaining game, including innovation of bifacially
flaked stone projectile points by a process of transference from
similarly shaped wood and bone points. Exactly when the long process
of the peopling of the Americas began will be determined by future
archaeologists who are not hampered by a model with untenable assumptions
that unduly restricts free scientific thought and action.

|