TOWARDS LIFELONG EDUCATION FOR ALL — TEACHERS
1961-1964First secondary teacher-training institutes created with the assistance of UNESCO and the United Nations Special Fund
|
... AND REDEFINE THE ROLES AND PROFILES OF TEACHERS The first activities, studies, experiments and pilot projects soon brought to light that one of the major concerns in this field was linked to the design and implementation of training programmes engendered by the adoption of new contents and methods (for example, audiovisuals) and by growing anxieties amongst teachers on how to improve their qualifications. The issue of identifying the new roles and profiles of teachers had therefore to be addressed from the point of view of enhancing their professionalism, their ability to adapt to the changes taking place in their milieux whilst at the same time contributing actively to such changes within the framework of local community development. This question would be taken up as the central theme of the International Conference on Education in 1975 which, in particular, took into account the experience acquired by teacher-training institutes (teacher- training colleges, rural teacher-training colleges, and higher teacher-training colleges) created in the previous decade with the participation of UNESCO. |
|
TEACHER-TRAINING INSTITUTES IN AFRICA
|
| 1964 | 1967 | 1972 |
|---|---|---|
Tecnical Tranining Centre for Women, Dakar, Senegal. |
Secondary School Teacher-training Institute, Bujumbura, Burundi |
Training Institute for Secondary School Teachers, Omdurman, Sudan |
|
UNESCO DELEGATION VISITS ABIDJAN
André Lestage, Division Chief
in UNESCO’s Education Department, arrived in Abidjan yesterday
morning accompanied by Dragoljub Najman, in charge of primary teacher
training programmes.
Mr André Lestage declared that the delegation he was heading was to discuss
with the authorities the status
and development of co-
operation between the Côte d’Ivoire and UNESCO in the field of education.
Extract from the daily
newspaper Fraternité Matin,
Friday, 19 May 1967.
|
||
|
THE THREE THRUSTS OF UNESCO’S ACTION... In order to promote, sustain and verify these innovative trends in real terms, UNESCO has pursued its activities in three complementary ways: Studies to disseminate educational innovations As of the 1950s, and then in the 1960s, many kinds of studies were carried out to identify and define qualitative and quantitative needs and the innovations required to meet them. Results provided a regularly updated insight into the state-of-the-art of training worldwide, enabling positive experiences to be pinpointed, and decisions taken as to their generalization. The aim of this research was not to obtain knowledge per se, but to describe, analyse and assess facts or situations so as to produce practical approaches or pointers as to method, given concrete expression in the form of pilot projects, regional or sub-regional training courses and methodological guides, enabling maximum advantage to be taken of the most significant developments. Standards to guide decision-making Without neglecting the great variety of situations and problems with which Member States have been and continue to be faced, it was necessary to define general principles for action and analytical criteria that would assist Member States to formulate their educational policy, especially insofar as educational personnel was concerned. This function has been fulfilled through the drafting of Recommendations: first of all the joint UNESCO-ILO Recommendation adopted in Paris on 5 October 1966 by a Special Intergovernmental Conference on the status of teachers and, later, Recommendation No. 69 adopted in 1975 in Geneva by the 35th session of the International Conference on Education which to this day constitute a frame of reference for the teaching profession and teachertraining in light of the concept of lifelong education. The CD-ROM (Vol. I) which accompanies this brochure contains the full text of these recommendations. | |
|
Encouraging the exchange of national experiences Between 1964 and 1975, interregional meetings were convened every two years. For one or two weeks, these meetings gathered together national directors and chief technical advisers of UNDP-UNESCO operational projects to train educational personnel. On these occasions, participants shared their experience on common problems, such as organization and management, before going on to examine a specific topic in greater detail, as shown by the following recapitulative table.
Meeting location Date Topic under discussion In this way, each training project became a further training forum for its own personnel enabling them to keep abreast of events. For UNESCO, it was proof of its fidelity to the principles of lifelong education of which it was the forerunner. |
René Maheu (France) Director-General of UNESCO from 1962 to 1974 Teacher-training institutes, forming an integral part of the national education systems, must be imbued with a new spirit and train qualified teachers who will have a role to play both in the schools and in the outside community. Report of the Director-General on the Activities of the Organization, 1968
The Faure Commission Learning to Be, UNESCO, 1972
Paulo Freire Education on the move, UNESCO, 1975
|
|
UNESCO-ILO JOINT RECOMMENDATION The Joint UNESCO-ILO Recommendation on the status of teachers was adopted in 1966. The fact that this instrument was the result of collaboration between these two Organizations respectively competent in the fields of education and labour endorsed the recognition that the status and the working conditions of teachers on the one hand, and their educational effectiveness on the other, are indissociable and interdependent. The main teachers’ unions co-operate with UNESCO, joining fully in the application of this recommendation, which is, moreover, the frame of reference of a joint UNESCO-ILO Committee of experts which meets periodically.
|
|
An operational commitment to put theory into practice
At the beginning of the 1960s, the problems brought about by decolonization and the awakening of deprived nations led UNESCO to become directly involved in large-scale operational action in technical co- operation for development made possible by means of a rapid upsurge in extra-budgetary funding, chiefly from the United Nations System. This was an activity which was to intensify until the beginning of the 1980s. Whilst bearing in mind the need for universality, UNESCO’s action is, nevertheless, carried out with due respect to specific regional contexts. In Africa activities were mainly in the form of direct intervention, in Latin America, they consisted in stimulating or strengthening existing institutions, and in Asia action was usually limited to guiding or facilitating co-ordination and networking of individual initatives. This operational action in technical co-operation for development was later followed up within a different international context, and with much more limited financial resources. Direct management of operational projects had offered the Organization a twofold opportunity: to verify the relevance and feasibility of the main ideas it proposed or conveyed, and to draw from the realities of field work the stimulation required to nourish its intellectual vocation. It also enabled the Organization to weigh up the various obstacles to the introduction and the propagation of educational innovations (6) and thus to refine its hypotheses of action, and its conceptual and methodological tools. |
|
to train teachers and other educational personnel
In 1967, 93 experts were at work in 47 countries. These were, notably, in
Africa: Burundi, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Congo-Brazzaville,
Congo-Léopoldville, Côte d’Ivoire, Ethiopia, Gabon, Madagascar, Mali,
Mauritania, Niger, Nigeria, Somalia, United Republic of Tanzania and Uganda;
in the Arab States: Iraq, Lebanon, Libya, Morocco, Turkey and Yemen;
|
FOOTNOTES:
(6) In particular, the most subtle and most difficult obstacle to overcome, that of ‘the inherent inertia of educational systems which caused them to respond too sluggishly [...] even when resources have not been the main obstacle’ (Philip H. Coombs, The World Education Crisis, Oxford University Press, 1968).