1948International Congress of Representatives of Universities, Utrecht, The Netherlands
|
UNESCO has had a standing commitment to foster the development of higher education
and research since its foundation over fifty years ago. As we approach the end of
this century and prepare to enter a new millennium, we are witnessing an
unprecedented growth of enrolment figures as well as an unprecedented diversification
of types of higher education institutions. There is also increased awareness of its
vital role for economic and social development. Yet, higher education is confronted
with critical issues in practically all countries of the world. Although enrolments
are on the increase, the
capacity for public support is declining and the enormous gap between developing and
developed countries with regard to higher learning and research, which had begun to
be reduced in the 1960s, is often widening.
UNESCO’s activities in higher education focus on three main objectives. The first,
which goes back to the 1950s, resulted from the function that higher education
institutions were – and still are – called upon to fulfil within the overall
education system in respect of training educational personnel (management staff,
as well as teachers) and in respect of research in all the Organization’s fields of
competence. The second
objective corresponds to UNESCO’s mandate in the sphere of intellectual co-operation;
today, just as in 1946, the challenge is how to strengthen institutions, such as
associations of universities, at the international and regional levels, among
developed and developing countries, and especially how to accelerate the exchange
of
knowledge and enhance co-operation and international understanding. The third
objective, linked to the second was – and still is – to facilitate teacher and
student mobility by encouraging the recognition of studies and diplomas between
institutions and countries. Furthermore, the Organization has been unceasing in
its endeavours to support multidisciplinary activities devoted to the study and
to the solution of worldwide economic, social and cultural development problems.
The rapidly
expanding UNITWIN/UNESCO-Chairs programme is aimed at reinforcing UNESCO’s action
in pursuing these objectives.
|
|
HIGHER EDUCATION TO PROMOTE SCIENCE AND RESEARCH by Julian Huxley
The programme for distribution of scientific and technical apparatus has been
integrated into this UNESCO-wide programme.
Work is also beginning in co-operation with international scientific organizations
brought together in the International Council of Scientific Unions, on the study of
scientific documentation, scientific work of international significance,
scientific apparatus information, scientific cinema films, a world register of
scientists and facilitation of travel of scientists throughout the world.
At the request of the United Nations, UNESCO has prepared a detailed report on the possibility of the establishment of International Scientific
Laboratories and Observatories.
Again, we are proposing to move on in 1948 from the problem of improving scientific
abstract services to the new problem of rationalizing the methods of scientific
publications in general. Here the gap is not large, but the problem of filling
it is full of technical difficulties.
A somewhat larger gap should be filled by the new project on the needs and methods
of university development, which is not only of obvious importance for UNESCO’s work,
but will appeal to the influential interest group consisting of university teachers,
research workers and administrators. Of similar scope is the project for stimulating
the mass-production of cheap books on subjects with which UNESCO is concerned, and
that for
increasing popular understanding of the social implications of science.
From the Director-General’s Report on UNESCO |
|
UNIVERSITY PROBLEMS REVIEWED AT THE UTRECHT CONGRESS
Pointing out that U.S. policy is to provide higher education to as many people as
possible rather than to a select few, Dr Thomas R. McConnell, of the University
of Michigan (U.S.A.) declared:
‘In England, less than 2% of university-age young people attended the universities
there in 1947, whereas about 15% of the 18-21 year age group attended institutions
of higher learning in the United States.’
Professor Georges Scelle of the Faculty of Law, University of Paris, on the other
hand, [...] ‘We see a danger in an inflation of diplomas which might deprive them
of all their value, or even an inflation of the number of students. The result
would be not the selection of an elite, but a system of ‘mass education’, which is
inconsistent with the very notion of higher education.’
Professor Jan B. Kozak, of Charles (Caroline) University, Prague: ‘Any help from
international organizations will be keenly appreciated; it will constitute one of
the best investments ever made.’ He asked UNESCO to make this need widely known.
The same story of overcrowded universities, lack of teachers, destroyed or outmoded educational equipment was told by representatives of many countries in their reports on the conditions of higher education in their native lands. For the most part, institutions were eagerly seeking to overcome these
deficiencies and meet the needs of expanding enrolment.
As Dr Atta Akrawi, Chief of the Division of Higher Education, Iraq, pointed out:
‘The great influx of students into institutions of higher learning and their
insistent demands for admission in even larger numbers [...] is a phenomenon
here to stay in most countries, as deep social forces are at work, and the sooner
the universities face this situation squarely the better.’
The Conference recognized that the role of the university was, to a large degree, determined by the attitude of each nation. But it urged that ‘universities should consider afresh the part they must play in economic and social education [...] that many students capable of higher education still lack the opportunity of achieving it [...] then no university can afford to neglect the moral and aesthetic development of its students and special emphasis must be laid on the importance of community life [...] that much greater effort should be expended than at present on research in the social sciences and creative work in the humanities [...] and that the university has a wide social responsibility to the nation and beyond the nation to humanity at large.’
The conference was unanimous in its recommendations that international co-operation among universities is desirable and necessary. In fact, it initiated the first steps essential to provide the necessary machinery for such co-operation.
It set up an Interim Committee of ten members (nominating nine) to draw up a proposed constitution for an international association of universities. The Committee will also administer an International Universities Bureau to be created immediately and plan for another world conference of universities sometime after August, 1950.
The UNESCO Courier, September 1948.
|
Karl Jaspers (Germany) Philosopher To the extent that the university seeks truth through science, research is its fundamental task. Since that task presupposes the passing on of knowledge, research is bound up with teaching. Teaching means allowing students to take part in the research process. Die Idee der Universität, 1923. Translated into English in 1959
Ronald E. Walker Presentation of the Report of the Director-General, Third session of the General Conference of UNESCO, Beirut, November 1948
Constantine K. Zurayk Message to UNESCO on the occasion of the Twentieth Anniversary of the Organization, 4 November 1966
|