|
International
Adult Learners Week Network of Learning festivals |
|
IntALWinE Network Partners Country Windows Network Activities Tools & Products Policy Proposals !!! News !!! Related Materials Stories & Voices Comments & Contacts |
Working Scheme Network Meetings & Study Visits Activities with Adult Learners |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
International Adult Learners Forum4 - 6 October 2004
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Forum was the first of three learner-centred activities of IntALWinE. Within the network, the design of the programme of the Forum was discussed, and the network partners nominated an adult learner from their country. It was agreed that the adult learner should be able to communicate in English as the event would be held in the UK and 'interpreters' costs would not be part of the funding. The adult learner should also provide of leadership skills and confidence to take part in the International Forum. A few places were available for network partners to attend.
NIACE, the UK partner of IntALWinE, organised the Forum as a a residential event at one of the Adult Residential Colleges in the UK. Knuston Hall in Northamptonshire was chosen as it has the easiest access to London airports. The event was planned for Monday 4 - Wednesday 6 October 2004 with an overnight stay in London to collect the group together on 3 October 2004. The UK participants joined the group in London on the Monday.
The international learners were given a choice of educational visits in and around London on the morning of 4 October.
The aims of the International Adult Learners Forum were to:
Facilitators (Sue Duffin & Val Saunders)
Network Partners (NIACE, Slovenian Institute for Adult Education, Norwegian
Association for Adult Education, and the UNESCO Institute for Lifelong
Learning)
Bulgaria, Cyprus, England, Estonia, Finland, Iceland, Lithuania, Norway, Romania, Scotland, Slovenia, Switzerland, the Netherlands, and Wales.
Four of the participating learners were from the UK, and they all had had previous experience of involvement in a forum at national or local level.
The final group consisted of 21 participants with 15 learners. All participants had been sent a questionnaire prior to the Forum asking for information about themselves and their learning. Participants responded to:
11 female and 4 male
| Age range | 20-29 | 30-39 | 40-49 | 50+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of learners | 2 | 5 | 4 | 4 |
The participants brought a range of experience of learning:
| Basic Skills | 2 |
|---|---|
| Computing/ICT | 3 |
| Languages | 3 |
| Business Skills | 1 |
| Economics | 1 |
| Fashion design | 1 |
| Creative writing | 1 |
| Music | 1 |
| Higher Education | 3 |
Half the participants had traveled to the UK before and only one felt 'not confident'. This participant was met at the airport on arrival.
Participants were asked to identify what training needs they would like included. The responses suggested that all skills would be welcomed.
| Listening Skills | 10 |
|---|---|
| Committee Skills | 13 |
| Presentation Skills | 11 |
| How to become more confident | 12 |
| Working as part of a team | 12 |
Three participants were dyslexic. One required large print/colored paper. One participant had a sensory impairment.
The participants represented a huge range of background. One woman ran her own business, two participants worked with people with learning difficulties and disabilities. One man used sport and athletics as a medium. Two participants were involved alongside professionals in contributing to Learning Festivals and in other European projects. Two were teachers of children or adults. On the whole the group was made up of confident and well experienced individuals.
The programme was planned to ensure time was allocated to sharing experience, time to discuss 'consultation and learner involvement' and short introductory sessions of training. Confident participants were included in the delivery alongside two experienced facilitators. Participants were encouraged to chair the discussion groups and to make the final presentations. The programme finished with a session about how to take the work forward by UIL and by the group itself.
Getting to know each other; Programme and Domestics; Outcomes of the Seminar; Ground rules; Recording learning.
Methods of consultation - from participants and expanded; advantages and disadvantages of different methods from a learner perspective; a Learners Forum - tips on how to set up.
How learners can get more involved - as enthusiasts; as promoters of
learning; in local research; as a learner representative on local/regional
committees; as a member of a Learners Forum; as a speaker at a conference
or seminar; as a delegate of a conference or seminar. How can more learners
be encouraged to get involved?
What support or training do learners need?
Local visit to a typical Northamptonshire town hosted by the Mayor.
Ten Tips for involving learners -discussion around final Ten Points as a start of a policy document.
'What is a Learners Forum?' - question and answer session.
Where do we go from here? What do we need to do to take this work forward?
How can the group keep in touch? What can participants take back?
What do they need to consider for their own situation? Evaluation.
Participants were asked to comment on a number of questions.
How well have you achieved what you hoped to learn from this forum?
Most participants felt that the event had been useful in a number of ways:
building confidence; chance to use and improve English, information to
take back and use in their own situation.
How well has the forum met your personal needs and expectations?
All participants stated that their needs and expectations had been met
and in many cases exceeded. New ideas, vision for the work and motivation
were all quoted as benefits.
What have you liked most about the forum?
Meeting new people and sharing experiences were sources of satisfaction.
The organisation of the event and the interactive nature of the activities
were mentioned by several participants as was the relaxed and friendly
atmosphere. Working in small groups was appreciated.
What have you liked least about the forum?
'Time' seems to have caused some concern. Too short a time, pressure of
time and a tightly packed schedule were all mentioned but several participants
stated there was nothing they didn't like.
If you had been running the forum, what would you have done differently?
A few suggestions here included clarifying the meaning of a 'Forum' and
a cultural visit.