The Cape Town Statement
on
Characteristic Elements of a
Lifelong Learning Higher
Education Institution
January 2001
“We see a key purpose of lifelong
learning as democratic citizenship, ………. Democratic citizenship highlights
the importance of women and men as agents of history in all aspects of
their lives.”
(As quoted by Professor Kadar Asmal,
National Minister of Education of South Africa at the opening of the Cape
Town conference, 10 October 2000.)
| This statement grew out of a
need recognised by adult and higher educators, scholars and specialists
in the area of adult and lifelong learning to build on previous work focusing
on transforming institutions of higher education into institutions of lifelong
learning.
It continues the work begun at
the Fifth International Conference on Adult Education in Hamburg, Germany,
1997, continued at the University of Mumbai, India in 1998, and the UNESCO
World Conference on Higher Education in Paris in 1998.
It was developed at the conference
on Lifelong Learning, Higher Education and Active Citizenship from the
10 - 12 October 2000 in Cape Town which was co-hosted by University of
Western Cape, UNESCO Institute for Education and the Adult Education Research
Group of the Danish National University of Education.
We wish to acknowledge and thank
the organisers of the conference : Professor Shirley Walters, Mr Werner
Mauch and Professor Ove Korsgaard, who were assisted by the local team
of Jenny Raatz, Glen Arendse, Jos Koetsier, Natheem Hendricks, Terry Volbrecht
and Kathy Watters. Thanks also to the participants, who are listed at the
back, for their active contributions. |
The Cape Town Statement is presented
as an organisational tool to be developed further in local contexts. For
more information or to give feedback on this document and your use of it,
please contact one of the organisers listed at the end of this document.
BACKGROUND
In this statement, we are taking forward
the work started at the Fifth International Conference on Adult Education
in Hamburg, Germany, 1997, continued at the University of Mumbai, India
in 1998, and the UNESCO World Conference on Higher Education in Paris in
1998.
We recall the commitment made in
Article 19 (a) of the Agenda for the Future adopted by the Fifth International
Conference on Adult Education to
[open] schools, colleges
and universities to adult learners:
(a) by requiring institutions
of formal education from primary level onwards to be prepared to open their
doors to adult learners, both women and men, adapting their programmes
and learning conditions to meet their needs;
(b) by developing coherent mechanisms
to recognize the outcomes of learning undertaken in different contexts,
and to ensure that credit is transferable within and between institutions,
sectors and states;
(c) by establishing joint university/community
research and training partnerships, and by bringing the services of universities
to outside groups;
(d) by carrying out interdisciplinary
research in all aspects of adult education and learning with the participation
of adult learners themselves;
(e) by creating opportunities
for adult learning in flexible, open and creative ways, taking into account
the specificities of women's and men's lives;
And we recall the Article 1(b) of the
World
Declaration on Higher Education for the Twenty-First Century which
states that core missions and values of higher education are to:
provide opportunities
for higher learning and for learning throughout life, giving to learners
an optimal range of choice and flexibility of entry and exit points within
the system, as well as an opportunity for individual development and social
mobility in order to educate for citizenship and for active participation
in society, with a worldwide vision, for endogenous capacity building,
and for the consolidation of human rights, sustainable development, democracy
and peace, in a context of justice;
as well as Article 1(a) of the Framework
for Priority Action for Change and Development of Higher Education
which states that
no discrimination can
be accepted, no one can be excluded from higher education or its study
fields, degree levels and types of institutions on grounds of race, gender,
language, religion, or age or because of any economic or social distinctions
or physical disabilities;
We take into account, that lifelong
learning is dependent on both the individual and the social context and
that learning occurs in institutions, but can also occur anyway, anywhere
and at anytime throughout life. That is, it is life long, life wide, and
life deep.
As pointed out in The Mumbai Statement
on Lifelong Learning, Active Citizenship and the Reform of Higher Education,
we understand, that
the transformation to
genuine lifelong learning institutions requires a holistic approach which
a) supports the institution becoming a lifelong learning community itself;
b) integrates academic, financial and administrative elements; c) provides
structures which are responsible for organizational, staff, student and
curriculum development and community engagement; and d) aligns the various
supportive structures such as academic information systems, library provision
and learning technologies to the new mission of universities in learning
societies (Art. 9);
and that a key purpose of lifelong learning
is active citizenship which is important in terms of
connecting individuals
and groups to the structures of social, political and economic activity
in both local and global contexts. Democratic citizenship highlights the
importance of women and men as agents of history in all aspects of their
lives (Art. 3).
Thus lifelong learning enables students
to learn at different times, in different ways, for different purposes
at various stages of their lives and careers. Lifelong learning is concerned
with providing learning opportunities throughout life, while developing
lifelong learners. Furthermore, in a Higher Education Institution (HEI)
all members of the institution are learners and that at different times
the members of the institution will take on different roles. These roles
include educator, student, administrator, cleaner, and so on.
The Future
While we recognise that it is difficult
to create a generic document, which can work across differing contexts,
and yet still makes sense in a specific context, we have developed a set
of elements, which characterise a Lifelong Learning Higher Education Institution,
for use as an instrument to assist transformation within HEIs. We also
recognise that performance indicators which provide quantifiable measures,
covering individual, social and economic development needs would be helpful.
The development of such indicators should be based on the profound knowledge
of respective systems of higher education and emerging systems of lifelong
learning.
In developing indicators which assess
a lifelong learning HEI which ensures “no discrimination on grounds of
race, gender, language, religion, or age or because of any economic or
social distinctions or physical disabilities”, it is essential to monitor
the experiences of all lifelong learners (including students and staff)
across the various social categories. Lifelong learning challenges the
dominant paradigm of HEIs, therefore the experiences of adult learners
need to be monitored with extra care.
This document suggests the following
six sets of characteristic elements which are necessary to support a lifelong
learning HEI. The following table gives these six characteristic elements
and a short description.
| Characteristic Elements |
Description |
| 1. Overarching Frameworks |
Overarching frameworks
provide the contexts, which facilitate an HEI to operate as a lifelong
learning institution. These are: Regulatory, Financial and Cultural/Social. |
| 2. Strategic Partnerships
and Linkages |
Partnerships and linkages
include the following: forming relationships internationally; forming relationships
with other institutions; forming relationships within institutions as well
as forming relationships with other groups in society. |
| 3. Research |
Research is understood
in a broad sense and includes working across disciplines and / or across
institutions. Lifelong learning is regarded as an important and legitimate
research area. |
| 4. Teaching and Learning
Processes |
Educators encourage
self-directed learning, engage with the knowledges, interests and life
situations which learners bring to their education and use open and resource
based learning approaches. |
| 5. Administration Policies
and Mechanisms |
Service to learners
is the top priority of the administration |
| 6. Student Support Systems
and Services |
Learners are supported
to become independent learners in various ways |
1. Overarching Frameworks
Overarching frameworks provide
the context that facilitates an HEI to operate as a lifelong learning institution.
These are: Regulatory, Financial and Cultural/Social.
Regulatory
-
A facilitating regulatory framework
promotes lifelong learning and covers financial, legal and social concerns.
-
The national and/or regional economic
and social developmental strategies and implementation plans support lifelong
learning.
-
A national framework facilitates vertical
and lateral mobility of learners
Financial
-
At a national and institutional level
a financial plan is in place to support the transformation of HEI into
lifelong learning institutions.
-
Institutional planning and implementation
strategies integrate financial, academic and administrative elements.
Cultural/Social
-
There is a culture which supports learning
for all, across differences regarding social class, caste, gender, ‘race’,
religion, and at all stages in life.
-
There is a national, regional and institutional
commitment to making learning opportunities available to all.
2. Strategic Partnerships and Linkages
In partnerships and linkages we
include the following: forming relationships internationally; forming relationships
with other institutions; forming relationships within institutions as well
as forming relationships with other groups/sectors in society.
International partnerships and
linkages
-
Lifelong learning institutions in the
globalizing world strive for a broad exchange on teaching/learning systems
and collaboration across national boundaries. This is for: sharing knowledge
and know-how; partnerships and alliances based on common interest, mutual
respect and desire to attain social justice, globally and locally; enhancing
the sharing of skills, research opportunities, and staff and student development.
Partnerships and linkages across
institutions and society
-
A lifelong learning HEI strives for
greater collaboration among institutions and between institutions and client
groups such as trade unions, governmental agencies, other educational sectors,
social agencies and employers to achieve mutually sought goals. This includes
sharing human and other resources and embarking on joint research projects.
-
The development of a `learning region`
together with other social partners is part of the commitment of the institution
Partnerships and linkages within
institutions
-
Decision-making is a shared responsibility
based on collaborative processes among academic staff, service staff and
learners to create rapid responses to learner and community needs.
These stakeholders are involved in decisions on choice of programmes, assessment
of learning outcomes, curriculum design and methods.
-
Policies and strategies are in place
to foster interaction among learners, faculty, communities and the economy
in order to encourage commitments to social justice both locally and globally.
-
The lifelong learning HEI is involved
in developing, evaluating and implementing educational programmes for all
sectors of education, not only the Higher Education sector
3. Research
Research is understood in a broad
sense and includes working across disciplines and / or across institutions.
Lifelong learning is regarded as an important and legitimate research area.
-
Lifelong learning is regarded as an
important and legitimate research and teaching area.
-
Research working across disciplines
and institutions is recognised and promoted.
-
There is collaborative research with
civil society, the economy and learners.
-
Different paradigms of research are
recognised. This includes amongst others action research, case studies
and story telling.
-
There is ongoing research and development
to meet the changing needs of the learner community, to promote broad access
and to facilitate successful learning.
-
There is ongoing research to assess
the transforming institution
4. The Teaching and Learning Processes
Educators encourage self-directed
learning, engage with the knowledges, interests and life situations which
learners bring to their education and use open and resource based learning
approaches
-
Educators engage with the knowledges,
interests and life situations that learners contribute to the teaching/learning
processes and they build on the resources and experiences of the learners.
Different `ways of knowing` are valued which enable marginalised social
groups to be full participants in the creation and dissemination of knowledge.
-
Educators facilitate and manage learning
rather than dispense information. Learners are seen by educators
as co-creators of knowledge and are often encouraged to participate in
the design of learning activities including mechanisms of continuous evaluation
and feedback.
-
Educators recognise the need for reflective
/ practice based learning.
-
Educators recognise the value of keeping
up to date with theories and best practices of adult learning across age
and other differences.
-
Educators and learners recognise that
learning in higher education can take place according to flexible schedules
and at different locations. They incorporate this into course design and
presentation and ensure that the materials and structures for learning
made available through the institution overcome the barriers of place,
space, time and pace which restrict opportunities for learning in traditional
structures.
-
The institution makes its resource-based
learning environment accessible to learners wherever they are, not just
on campus. Learners are encouraged to make use of support services such
as the library. Such services are made available through suitable technology
according to the needs of the students’ off-campus as well as on campus.
-
Course presentation and opportunities
to enrol for and study courses include the use of multi- and combined-media
delivery and support, utilising the technologies, both old and new, and
the flexible learning structures of open and distance learning. This includes
print, correspondence, mass media, occasional face-to-face tutorials and
study-groups, ICT etc.
-
Provision is made for self-paced independent
study by providing for students to study effectively wherever, whenever
and whatever pace is appropriate for them.
-
Assessment takes place in various forms
and continuously.
-
Programmes include opportunities for
experiential learning (e.g. field work, workplace learning, community service
learning)
5. Administration Policies and Mechanisms
Service to learners is the top
priority of the administration
-
The institution needs to indicate in
the mission statement its intention to be an open and lifelong learning
institution. There also needs to be an implementation strategy as part
of the overall planning in the institution together with the necessary
resource allocations.
-
University course information booklets
embrace the notion of lifelong learning.
-
Service to students is the top priority
of the administration department - so registration, lecture times and academic
support are all available at times and in formats geared to the convenience
of learners including off-campus open learners. Registration occurs regularly
throughout the year.
-
Prior learning is recognised, both in
terms of obtaining access and getting credit for modules. This includes
having clearly defined criteria for what constitutes tertiary level learning.
-
Programmes are in place to facilitate
implementation of recognising prior learning (RPL). This includes training
people to do the assessment as well as preparing educators to be cognisant
of RPL in their teaching and design of curriculum.
-
In addition to RPL, progress is made
towards a more flexible, open entry system which, along with careful counselling,
is designed to give students the chance to prove themselves rather than
to exclude where formal criteria are not met.
-
The turnaround time on assignments,
especially for distance students, is kept to a minimum and specified to
the learners so that they can use feedback on their assignments to inform
their learning on an ongoing basis.
-
More flexible curricular compilation
structures (in which students can exercise choice of subjects and subject
combinations relevant to their own individual needs) are in place leading
to recognised qualifications.
-
Much more flexible progression rates
and ability to move between different study modes within a qualification
are in place.
-
Programmes are arranged to allow for
flexible entry and exit points.
6. Student Support Systems and Services
Learners are supported to become
independent learners in various ways
-
The obligations and responsibilities
of the learners and the educational providers are made clear at registration.
-
It is clear what resources and equipment
the provider will supply, and where, and what the learners themselves have
to supply.
-
The institution creates and maintains
geographically dispersed and technologically accessible learning and support
structures wherever the students are.
-
Tutors are selected and trained for
their role of facilitating learning.
-
Learners are supported to become independent
learners through the use of various forms. These must include: technology
old and new throughout the geographical area where students live for tutoring
at a distance, contact tutoring, teaching on assignments, mentoring, counselling
(both remote and face to face) and the stimulation of peer support structures.
-
There is a constant effort to be creative
about the ways to keep costs low for students, including multiple avenues
for paying tuition.
-
Childcare, transport and catering are
available to ensure a safe, secure and comfortable environment to meet
the needs of all learners. This includes the special needs of learners
with a disability as well as those studying at-a-distance.
| List
of delegates at Cape Town Conference
|
| Prof John
Aitchison |
South Africa |
|
Prof Ove
Korsgaard |
Denmark |
| Ms Lucy Alexander |
South Africa |
|
Ms Petra
Lawson |
South Africa |
| Ms Randi
Anderson |
Denmark |
|
Prof Geoff
Layer |
England |
| Dr Mejai
Avoseh |
Namibia |
|
Mr Wolfgang
Leumer |
South Africa |
| Mr Ivor Baatjies |
South Africa |
|
Prof P.C.
Lubout |
South Africa |
| Prof Saleem
Badat |
South Africa |
|
Ms Marieda
Luyt |
South Africa |
| Dr Gerda
Bender |
South Africa |
|
Dr Lekhotla
Mafisa |
South Africa |
| Mr Johan
Bolts |
Germany |
|
Mr Werner
Mauch |
UIE |
| Ms Maria
Bonino |
Uruguay |
|
Prof Elana
Michelson |
USA |
| Ms Fiona
Bulman |
South Africa |
|
Ms Ingrid
Miller |
South Africa |
| Dr Jane Castle |
South Africa |
|
Mr Veli Mnyandu |
South Africa |
| Ms Linda
Cooper |
South Africa |
|
Mr Daniel
Mokoena |
South Africa |
| Dr Beth Crossan |
Scotland |
|
Prof Kathy
Munro |
South Africa |
| Ms Rabai
Dawjee |
South Africa |
|
Prof Pauline
Murphy |
Ireland |
| Ms Nomvuyo
Dayile |
South Africa |
|
Prof Dani
Nabudere |
Uganda |
| Prof Tony
Dodds |
Namibia |
|
Dr Renuka
Narang |
India |
| Dr Dalina
Dowling |
South Africa |
|
Dr Alice
Ndidde |
Uganda |
| Dr Pamela
Dube |
South Africa |
|
Ms Jennifer
Newman |
Australia |
| Prof Chris
Duke |
Australia |
|
Prof Muxe
Nkondo |
South Africa |
| Mr Justin
Ellis |
Namibia |
|
Prof Akapovire
Oduaran |
Botswana |
| Ms Lisbeth
Eriksson |
Sweden |
|
Prof Angina
Parech |
South Africa |
| Ms Ninelle
Evans |
South Africa |
|
Ms Helen
Peters |
England |
| Ms Pia Falkencron |
Denmark |
|
Ms Anita
Pickerden |
England |
| Ms Judith
Favish |
South Africa |
|
Mr Larry
Pokpas |
South Africa |
| Ms Dahlia
Fittler |
Australia |
|
Mr Alan Ralphs |
South Africa |
| Prof Charles
Freysen |
South Africa |
|
Prof M Razafindrand-
riatsiminary |
Madagascar |
| Prof Jim
Gallacher |
Scotland |
|
Ms Linda
Ronnie |
South Africa |
| Prof Nqabomzi
Gawe |
South Africa |
|
Mr Peter
Rule |
South Africa |
| Mr Jonathan
Geidt |
South Africa |
|
Mr Johan
Serfontein |
South Africa |
| Mr Jorgen
Gleerup |
Denmark |
|
Ms Jawaya
Small |
South Africa |
| Ms Eve Gray |
South Africa |
|
Mr Valerian
Strydom |
South Africa |
| Dr Zelda
Groener |
South Africa |
|
Prof George
Subotzky |
South Africa |
| Dr Bernt
Gustavsson |
Sweden |
|
Dr Ngoato
Takalo |
South Africa |
| Ms Judy Harris |
England |
|
Ms Mandi
Taruvinga |
Zimbabwe |
| Dr Lean Heng |
Malaysia |
|
Dr Jane Thompson |
England |
| Dr John Henschke |
USA |
|
Ms Deborah
Tromp |
South Africa |
| Mr Henner
Hildebrand |
Germany |
|
Ms Siv Vahamaki-Sundman |
Finland |
| Dr Sipho
Hlope |
South Africa |
|
Ms Suzaan
van Aswegan |
South Africa |
| Prof Marianne
Horsdal |
Denmark |
|
Ms Karen
Vaughan |
Australia |
| Ms Angelina
Hurley |
Australia |
|
Dr L.J. van
der Westhuizen |
South Africa |
| Prof Sabo
Indabawa |
Namibia |
|
Ms Dalene
Venter |
South Africa |
| Ms Ferial
Isaacs |
South Africa |
|
Mr Terry
Volbrecht |
South Africa |
| Ms Salma
Ismail |
South Africa |
|
Prof Serge
Wagner |
Canada |
| Prof Peter
Jarvis |
England |
|
Ms Kathleen
Wallace |
Australia |
| Ms Anne Kathoire |
Uganda |
|
Prof Shirley
Walters |
South Africa |
| Ms Caroline
Kerfoot |
South Africa |
|
Ms Kathy
Watters |
South Africa |
| Prof C. T.
Keto |
South Africa |
|
Dr Tahir
Wood |
South Africa |
| Ms Leanne
King |
Australia |
|
|
|
For more information or to give
feedback on this document and your use of it, please contact:
Prof Shirley Walters
Division for Lifelong Learning
University of Western Cape
Private Bag X17
Bellville 7530
South Africa
Email: lifelong@uwc.ac.za
Phone 27-21-9593339 or Fax 27-21-9592481
Website: http://www.uwc.ac.za/dll/
OR
Werner Mauch
Unesco Institute for Education
Feldbrunnenstrasse 58,
20148 Hamburg
Germany
Email: w.mauch@unesco.org
Phone 49-40-448041-28 or Fax 49-40-4107723
back to the UIE homepage
|