| The EFA 2000 Assessment: Country Reports | ||
| Nigeria |
| Previous Page | Next Page |
The pupils questionnaire was focused on finding out such information as pupils liking for school, interest in school subjects, topics of interest in mathematics as science, possession of textbooks and opportunity to learn at home, including coaching classes.
The effect of the teacher on both the quantity and quality of instrument that takes place in the classroom seems obvious. But it also seems equally obvious that it is not everything about the teacher that is likely to be related to pupils learning. The teachers questionnaire was directed at finding out information about the teacher which could influence pupils learning - qualification and experience, amount of instructional materials made available of the teacher, amount of supervision he/she receives from the head teacher and the level of morale. The following is a summary of the responses of the teachers sampled:
A very proportion (80 percent) of the teacher in the sample had either Teachers Grade II certificate or the Nigeria Certificate in Education while only about 10 percent had no teaching qualification. The teachers had an average of eleven years of teaching experience and most of them had been teaching primary four in their current school for at least three years.
The information collected at school level was those, which can be used to look at the physical and human environment, provided for learning to take place. Such information included the qualification of the leadership of the school, the level of instructional materials, the level of staffing and financial provision etc. The head teachers of the sampled schools completed the questionnaires.
A well articulated Proposal is Prerequisite to an Unencumbered and Smoothly Executed Study. The project proposal was produced with assistance from two experts in Education Evaluation and Measurement and Testing. One of the Two `Wole Falayajo a renowned professor of National Assessments was retained as the lead consultant to the project. This proved to be advantageous. The quality of the draft proposal was considered so impressive that UNESCO accorded Nigeria the privilege as the first developing country to monitor its own MLA study.
A well-constituted team should provide a repertoire of expertise useful at different stages of implementation. Membership of the National Co-ordinating Committee was constituted to include national institutions involved in the administration and management of primary education. Representative of these institutions and other resource persons from Universities and related bodies provided a wide range of relevant expertise. This facilitated target attainment.
With limited financial resource, the selection of any Primary level for which instruments are to be developed and administered, should be based on carefully defined criteria. Primary IV was selected as target for the Nigerian study, because using any lower level, would have necessitated the translation of the test items into more than 270 local languages. This would have had enormous cost implication. In the same vain, pupils in the upper class; Primaries V and VI which are essentially `terminal' levels, are generally exposed to extra out-of-school coaching, preparatory to sitting competitive, selective examination, into secondary schools which would have introduced other factors outside school learning into performance levels.
7.2.8 B Other types of assessment:
Nigeria as a Country has evolved Policy on Education which is geared towards achieving identified national objectives. For the policy objectives to be realised, several approaches have been identified and suggested. One of these is the use of Continuous Assessment in schools upon which emphasis have been placed. The following extracts may perhaps state the better:
"Education Assessment and evaluation will be liberalised by basing them in whole or in part on Continuous Assessment of the progress of the individual".
Under the broad heading of Secondary Education, the Policy orientation of the Government on Continuous Assessment is stated in the following words:
"The first School certificate Examination will ultimately be abolished and Primary School Leaving Certificate will be issued by the Headmasters of individual School and be based on Continuous Assessment of pupils and not on the results of single final examination."
From the foregoing, it becomes clear that Government has placed special premium on Continuous Assessment practice in Schools. This shift from the existing practice to a new one must have been informed by the fact that Government had become sufficiently aware of the demerits of the system. With the above policy, centrally set examinations are no longer in use in primary schools. However, challenges Continuous Assessment in Nigeria is faced with numerous problems, some of which are listed below:
Lack of understanding of
Meaning of Continuous Assessment
Methods of data collection
instrument
administration of instruments
collection of data
Processing of such data for meaningful interpretation
statistical approaches.
Students population
Leads to poor assessment procedure
no more essays
mathematics are not graded
assignments are not given
4. Belief in CA and CA data
- pencils, exercise books, text books, etc.
PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHERS
The National Policy on Education has prescribed that the new minimum qualification required for teaching in the primary school is the National Certificates in Education. A situation and Policy Analysis Study was conducted in 1991 to 1992. The primary objective of the study was to elucidate empirically factors that affect quality and access to basic education. The findings highlighted the problems that plague the primary education system, one of which is the quality of teachers.
The problem of teacher qualification became more pronounced when in 1992 the Nigerian government introduced the 9 year schooling which required every child that enrolled for primary education to remain in school until the end of the three years of junior secondary school. Because there was no legislative backing and financial backing the policy did not take off as planned. The minimum qualification required for primary school teaching used to be Teachers Certificate Grade II (TCGDII) which was awarded by the National Teacher Institute. The minimum entry qualification for any teacher training programme is WASC/GCE OLEVEL. One year training in advance pedagogy and school administration qualified one as a Teacher Certificate Grade II (TC.GII). TC.GII still remains as teaching qualification, but the holders of these certificates are provided opportunities to upgrade their qualification to a National Certification of Education before the expiration of the period when no teacher with a qualification below National Certification in Education will be allowed to teach in any school in Nigeria. However, the National Council on (NCE), which is the highest policy reference point in Education, as a first step, has ordered that the employment of grade II teachers be stopped in favour of the numerous unemployed NCE holders who are without job. The table below shows the teacher situation in the primary schools in Nigeria. The general practice is that a teacher teaches all the arm of a class. NCE teachers are being trained to meet this task by including in their curriculum courses in Primary Mathematics, English Language, Social Studies and Primary Science. B.Ed (Pry) census are also being offered in some conventional universities.
Table 29
SUMMARY OF STATISTICS OF PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHERS IN NIGERIA BY QUALIFICATION, AND GENDER 1988 -1996 |
||||||||||||||||
N.C.E |
GRADE II |
|||||||||||||||
YEAR |
GRAD. QLY |
GRAD. UNQL |
& EQUAV. |
GRADE I |
CERTIFIED |
WASC/GCE |
OTHERS |
TOTAL |
||||||||
M |
F |
M |
F |
M |
F |
M |
F |
M |
F |
M |
F |
M |
F |
MF |
F |
|
1988 |
851 |
305 |
406 |
191 |
10162 |
4509 |
25019 |
13723 |
188630 |
72347 |
5080 |
1663 |
72521 |
11286 |
302669 |
104024 |
1989 |
1299 |
466 |
368 |
53 |
11904 |
4999 |
34649 |
13639 |
202281 |
85906 |
3094 |
971 |
90626 |
49487 |
344221 |
155621 |
1990 |
312 |
185 |
68 |
28 |
14907 |
6392 |
41668 |
24345 |
202729 |
97232 |
631 |
356 |
71600 |
13824 |
331915 |
142416 |
1991 |
1122 |
445 |
375 |
70 |
21862 |
9525 |
47337 |
27797 |
202803 |
99194 |
3385 |
1215 |
71716 |
12501 |
353600 |
150847 |
1992 |
1758 |
1122 |
672 |
324 |
30794 |
14863 |
44735 |
26583 |
|
|
4397 |
1924 |
66614 |
12289 |
369358 |
166844 |
1993 |
2767 |
1636 |
950 |
503 |
50857 |
26381 |
44995 |
26929 |
233115 |
114901 |
7042 |
2715 |
81129 |
15276 |
425475 |
189883 |
1994 |
2743 |
1471 |
1089 |
565 |
70260 |
37997 |
46049 |
27970 |
223201 |
112360 |
16695 |
6677 |
75173 |
14865 |
435210 |
201905 |
1995 |
5861 |
3394 |
8287 |
4581 |
109715 |
63380 |
35304 |
20345 |
177844 |
85068 |
20115 |
8746 |
65894 |
12413 |
423059 |
197931 |
1996 |
6174 |
3640 |
3208 |
1613 |
139025 |
82677 |
24763 |
13466 |
161550 |
78047 |
21291 |
8796 |
60740 |
11560 |
416745 |
199797 |
SOURCE: FEDERAL MIMISTRY OF EDUCATION,
STATISTICS DIVISION, ABUJA, NIGERIA
| Previous Page | Next Page |