SEMINARS: MERCOSUR countries discuss how education for work can be adapted to prevent marginaliztaion

Educating for work and poverty alleviation

Together with the Argentinian Instituto Nacional de Educacion Tecnologica (INET) and the Red Latinoamericana de Educacion y Trabajo (CIID-CENEP), IIEP organized a seminar on Education for the world of work and poverty alleviation, which took place in Buenos Aires in November 1995. With financial support from the Inter-American Development Bank, the seminar brought together 45 participants from high level positions at Ministries of Education and Labour, Institutes of Vocational and Technical Education, Training Institutions, researchers, and ONGs, coming from eight Latin-American countries, mainly representing MERCOSUR1. In addition, representatives from IDB, OREALC, and CINTERFOR were present.

Common trends
Despite differences between the countries, there are certain similarities in the economic and social context economic and social context economic and social context of the region. These include: the opening up of all economies to international markets; the adoption of very strict neo-liberal macro-economic policies (the so-called Washington Consensus) alongside measures to reform and modernize the State; great economic and financial instability; the increasing divide between a modern sector which has to remain competitive internationally - using the latest technologies, but also subcontracting many activities to small firms in order to keep production costs low - and the rest of the economy; and, the growing number of excluded unemployed youngsters and adults who are no longer, as they were in the past, completely illiterate. Finally, rising poverty remains a major concern in Latin America today.

In education also, there are no taboos against questioning anything and in some countries reforms tend to be general rather than piecemeal. There is a general agreement that changes need to take place at all levels (basic, secondary, vocational training and technical education).

Awareness is growing that education for the world of work starts at primary and that increased access to and retention in primary and secondary education is necessary to build up a skilled and flexible labour force. Every country is now committed to providing nine years of basic education for all. This objective is far from being achieved in many countries, however. Today, the students taught in primary and secondary schools come from very different backgrounds, and constitute a very heterogeneous group, both culturally and socially. Schools and classrooms have not changed their organization, nor have the teachers changed their pedagogical practices. As a result, the number of drop-outs, who later become marginalized, continues to increase.

Many countries in the region are introducing technology as a separate subject in the general secondary curriculum and this is meant to be an important contribution to the preparation for the world of work. Such programmes are costly and will have to be introduced progressively and monitored very carefully. Lessons could be drawn from science education. Recent IIEP studies on the condition of science education in a number of Latin American countries have shown that science teaching conditions are far from being satisfactory. Other studies have shown that pupil performance is low. Such poor results cannot be attributed to a lack of good epistemologists and curriculum developers, nor to a lack of good ideas on how to train teachers and how to renovate teaching methods. On the contrary, the first science kits were developed in Brazil and research on how to renovate science curricula, teaching methods and science teacher training abounds in Latin America. What is missing, however, is continuity of action, economic measures and support for teachers (including increasing their salaries), and a good governance at classroom and school level.

Another common characteristic is the changing role of the State in education as a movement towards decentralization and privatization is sweeping through Latin America. In technical education, just as in general primary and secondary education, more autonomy has been given to the municipalities or to the provinces. The latter, however, do not always receive the corresponding resources. Decentralization, in a number of countries, is primarily a way of reducing the financial burden on central government. In this process, a greater amount of autonomy is being granted to the schools, although still on a limited scale, and this is increasing the disparities between them.



Technical education
The discussion on technical education showed that there were basically threethree trends in the region :

Integrating technical education with general education. A number of countries intend to close their technical schools and transform them into ordinary secondary schools offering several options or modalities at secondary level: this is the case of Brazil, which is going to suppress its federal technical schools, considered too costly, and postpone the organization of technical courses to the post secondary level. This is also the case in Argentina where reforms envisage that all schools should become 'polymodal'.

Maintaining existing secondary technical schools and decentralizing their management to municipalities (Chile) or provinces (Mexico). Some autonomy is being granted to schools, allowing them to adapt their curriculum and the courses

they offer to the requirements of their environment, and to raise more resources, including selling their services to local enterprises.

A system is even being introduced in Mexico in which teachers will be paid on the basis of their results. This raises a number of problems, such as inequalities between States and between schools (Chile, Mexico), job instability for teachers and conflict with teachers' unions (Mexico).

Deregulating and allowing the rapidly growing private sector to apply for public funding (through a system of vouchers).. This is the case in Chile, where apparently private technical schools are more efficient than municipal schools. This may be due to the fact that private schools enjoy more managerial autonomy and/or that they tend to be selective in their recruitment, and to offer courses without risks. The option is thus not without its problems.



Vocational training
The vocational training system is also going through a period of questioning. Two models co-exist in the region: ",

The traditional 'S' model: SENAI, SENA. In Brazil, just as in Colombia a few years ago, the 'S' model is being seriously questioned by the Ministry of Labour on the one hand, and by the enterprises on the other. The biggest firms think that they can do the training better themselves, and that the additional taxation on salaries is reducing their competitiveness on the international market.

A model relying much more on enterprises and on private training institutions, applying to the Ministry of Labour for finance, as in Chile. This "demand-driven" model seems to guarantee a better match between supply and demand of trained labour. The disadvantages are, however, the same as those mentioned above for technical education. The lack of certification is another drawback. Enterprises seem to be reluctant to organize training themselves but, in some industries, the training is organized by the federation of enterprises.

Other trends in vocational training have to do with the increase in the number of actors and institutions intervening in training,

but also with the increased role of the State (i.e. the Ministry of Labour) in policy formulation, and in the system's regulation.

Training for marginalized youth is a growing preoccupation of countries. Programmes exist in many countries and the discussions allowed a comparison between the type of courses organized by a big vocational training institution or VTI, such as SENA, and models based more on ONGs and private institutions. The second category is becoming more and more generalized, as even the big VTIs now tend to sub-contract this type of course. The financing agency, whether the Ministry of Labour or the VTI, prepares terms of references and invites private institutions and associations to bid for the organization of the different courses. The formula allows a great deal of flexibility. Specifying norms in terms of costs and the expected results may end up, however, by ruling out application from some of the best performing institutions, which are often more expensive, and/or force institutions to be selective, so as to satisfy the success indicators.

Evaluation of programmes was talked about briefly, but this in itself could become the object of a new seminar.

Françoise Caillods and Maria Helena Maldonado-Villar.