|
AGENDA 21, the final document of the RioConference on Environment
and Development emphasises the importance of new scientific efforts
and approaches for achieving sustainable development. The following
four "programme areas" are identified:
- Strengthening the scientific basis for sustainable development
- Enhancing scientific understanding
- Improving longterm scientific assessment
- Building up scientific capacity and capability.
With respect to the understanding of sustainable development,
AGENDA 21 proposes a need to "intensify research to integrate
the physical, economic and social sciences to better understand
the impacts of economic and social behaviour on the environment
and of environmental degradation on local and global economies".
While the natural sciences traditionally are involved in environmental
research to a very high degree, the support for the social sciences
as well as the systematic enlisting of social scientific contributions
to interdisciplinary research in this field have not yet been
matched to the expectations of the postRioprocess.
A new strategic effort is needed both on the part of scientists
and policymakers, all the more so as sustainable development
does not merely deal with the conservation of nature or the management
of ecosystems, but more broadly and fundamentally aims at new
models of societal development and social transformation. Sustainability
refers to the viability of socially shaped relationships between
society and nature over long periods of time. Therefore, environmental
sustainability is closely linked to supposedly "internal"
problems of social structure, such as social justice, gender
equality and political participation of local actors.
With regard to such issues, there can be little doubt that substantial
and problemoriented contributions of the social sciences
are indispensable for the understanding of sustainability. This
means it is necessary to open both the natural and social sciences
to local environmental knowledge and different cultural and gender
experience in order to deepen the understanding of sustainability
in its environmental, economic, social, political and cultural
aspects and to avoid the supremacy of hegemonial, technocratic
and ethnocentric approaches.
We feel the following points reflect burning needs as how science
and related research policies should strengthen the role of the
social sciences within the research into sustainability:
- Of crucial importance is the establishment of new interdisciplinary
research programmes on the national as well as international level.
Within such new research programmes, the social sciences should
not only play an instrumental role for national governments or
natural scientific experts, but must express the multiplicity
of cultural, regional or gender perspectives on sustainable development.
- Closely linked to this issue, the building of scientific
capacities for sustainability research has to get started, particularly
in the socalled developing countries.
- Social scientists themselves must get involved in a process
of reorientation towards new issues as well as towards inter
or transdisciplinary work not only among the social science disciplines
but also in conjunction with natural sciences.
Given this situation in general and with the aim of strengthening
chapter 35 of AGENDA 21 we claim:
1. The MOSTProgramme ("Management of Social Transformations")
of UNESCO which can be regarded as an appropriate institutional
frame for sustainabilityrelated and policyrelevant
research in the social sciences must play a central role in international
research activities on sustainable development. Therefore,
we exhort both national governments, particularly those of the
industrialised countries, and international institutions to give
more and adequate financial and organisational support to the
MOSTProgramme in order to create a basis for interdisciplinary
and problemoriented social scientific research into sustainability.
2. Regarding the building of sustainability research capacities
in the social sciences, there is a strong need for new forms of
interdisciplinary research institutes and organisations able to
adequately study the problems raised by the objective of sustainable
development. Establishing new interdisciplinary "Centers
for Sustainability Studies" on international, national and
especially regional levels could be a suitable and successful
way to meet this need. In addition, existing institutions for
development studies ought to incorporate the different dimensions
of sustainability in their research. This implies a reorientation
of training and research in the industrialised countries of the
North as well as the building of independent training and research
capacities in the countries of the South. Interdisciplinary postgraduate
programmes with appropriate curricula should be established at
the universities of the North and South. The UNITWIN UNESCO Chairs
programme can be used as an appropriate framework in this respect.
Here too, the industrialised countries should engage much more
in supporting and enhancing this process.
3. As the concept of sustainability represents a fundamental challenge
at the theoretical and methodological levels, reorientation
within the social sciences themselves is required, implying
- firstly, to give more attention to now vital issues such
as land use, the social use of natural resources like water or
wood, production and consumption patterns, the loss of biodiversity,
etc.;
- secondly, to improve and intensify interdisciplinary cooperation
among the various social science disciplines. This is necessary
to achieve a more integrated and comprehensive understanding of
development processes, as well as the relationships between individuals
and the environment in their social, political, economic, psychological
and cultural aspects. With regard to this, the historical boundaries
between the disciplines must be reexamined and methodologies
of interdisciplinary research are to be developed;
- thirdly, to expand the problemoriented cooperation
between the social and the natural sciences on issues and questions
of sustainability. Of crucial importance here is that natural
and social sciences cooperate on an equal basis, starting from
the phase of defining the problems under study.
4. The project "Sustainability as a Concept of the Social
Sciences" within the MOSTProgramme of UNESCO has given
an important impulse for enhancing reorientation of both
the research policies and the social sciences towards the new
issues of sustainability. Moreover, it is intended to be the startingpoint
for building an international discussion and research network
of (social) scientists concerned with sustainability as well as
sustainable development policies. Policymakers interested
in sustainability issues should also be part of this network.
In order to promote social science research on sustainability,
exemplary research projects, especially in a crosscultural
and comparative perspective, are to be sketched out. Within this
framework a main concern should be the examination of policies
followed by the industrialised countries in order to contribute
to a global change towards sustainable development strategies.
Substantial steps towards sustainable development can only be
made, if national governments, Development Aid Agencies in industrialised
countries, the UN system, particularly UNESCO, UNDP, UNEP, the
World Bank, GEF (Global Environmental Fund), the European Union
as well as private foundations are willing to support social scientific
research on a broad organisational and financial basis. As a first
step, political and financial support must be given to crossnational,
social scientific pilot projects on sustainability, including
scientists from countries of the North and the South.
This declaration was drawn up by the participants
of the UNESCOMOST Project "Sustainability as a Concept
of the Social Sciences", bringing together scientists from
various countries and social science disciplines in order to initiate
and intensify a crossdisciplinary problemoriented
debate on the concept of sustainability.
The declaration is directed to the UN General Assembly in the
context of the evaluation of the postRio process and is
also addressed to national and international science institutions
and science and research policy authorities in this field.
Persons who are willing to support the matter of concern expressed
in the declaration, are invited to sign the declaration and to
pass it to other scientists, policymakers, media representatives
or other persons concerned with AGENDA 21.
Persons who would like to sign the declaration, are requested
to send a short note to the Institute for SocialEcological
Research, ISOE (isoegmbh@tonline.de)
|
|