Back to UNESCO WCS Home page


Women and gender, science, engineering
and technology

Sydney, Australia, 1-5 December 1998

Priorities for Science in the 21st Century for
the Asia-Pacific Region

Executive Summary

The United Nations, women and gender in SET and the Asia-Pacific Region
Contribution of APEC to women and gender in SET
Gender roles in science education in Asia–Pacific region
Key issues

The gender dimension describes the way in which culturally organized differences between men and women interact with historically and socially diverse scientific and technological practices, and their meanings. Scientific and technological cultures and practices shape gendered social relations and, in turn, are shaped by them. Thus the S&T that each culture has are a consequence, in part, of local and global gender relations, and each cultureís gender relations are the effect, in part, of past local and global S&T changes

World Science Report (UNESCO, 1996)

Preamble   Back to top

The afore-mentioned Asia–Pacific Conference was designed as part of the preparation for the World Conference on Science to be held in Budapest in 1999. Delegations from the following countries participated: Australia, Bangladesh, China, Fiji, India, Indonesia, Kiribati, Korea (Popular Democratic Republic of), Laos (Republic of), Malaysia, New Zealand, Ouzbekistan, Pakistan, Papua New Guinea, Philippines, Samoa, Salomon Islands, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Tonga, Vanuatu, Vietnam. Individuals from Argentina, Ecuador and Slovenia also attended.

The Conference provided an opportunity to review the scientific issues that affect this region, to identify priorities, and to explore ways of implementing programmes that address those priorities. The meeting provided the occasion to identify as one of the priorities the issue relating to women and gender in science, engineering and technology (SET). The present report endeavours to present the results of the discussions of the group on Women in Science and the papers read at the Conference, particularly those of Achmad and Hermawati (1), and Ancog (2). Furthermore, the present report consistently adheres to a Conference decision to use appropriately SET for science, engineering and technology, in preference to science and technology or S&T.

The United Nations, women and gender in SET and the Asia-Pacific Region   Back to top

A review of the emergence of the issue of women and gender in SET during the four world conferences on women organized by the United Nations discloses that there are four most persistent aspects which are considered essential for the advancement of women in SET. These are:

  • education and training in SET;

  • ability to use SET to improve their living conditions;

  • ability to develop SET or to become scientists and technologists and the ability to participate in decision-making processes and structures or in directing the development and application of SET, including the setting of priorities; and finally

  • elimination of the negative impacts, particularly of the new technologies such as biotechnology, information and communication technology, on women (1).

At the 1980 World Conference of the United Nations Decade for Women: Equality, Development and Peace, held in Copenhagen (Denmark), SET education was beginning to be seen as a prerequisite for the attainment of women’s real and equal participation in decision-making processes. The mid-Decade Conference held in Nairobi five years later to review progress began to be more specific about the importance of women’s participation in SET decision-making. The Science and Technology section of the Area for Specific Action of the Nairobi Forward-Looking Strategies for the Advancement of Women to the year 2000 stated that the full and effective participation of women in the decision-making and implementation process related to SET should be enhanced. In the Beijing Platform for Action document produced by the United Nations Fourth World Conference on Women: Action for Equality, Development and Peace (Beijing, China, 1995), concern over the under-representation of women in the decision-making structures and processes related to SET was highlighted in eight of the twelve critical areas identified by the Beijing Conference, namely: women and poverty, education and training, women and health, women and the economy, women in power and decision-making, women and the media, women and the environment, and the girl child. Although the following conferences did not specifically deal with women and gender in SET, they did address the pivotal role of SET, including social sciences, in overcoming or eliminating problems encountered and in furthering progress: United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 1992), World Conference on Human Rights (Vienna, Austria, 1993), International Conference on Population and Development (Cairo, Egypt, 1994) and the World Summit on Social Development (Copenhagen, Denmark, 1995).

Contribution of APEC to women and gender in SET   Back to top

Since 1996, with the introduction of the issue of women and gender in SET into the activities of the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) and the launching of the Women Leaders’ Network from APEC economies (1), women and gender in SET has been on the agenda of most APEC fora, committees and ministerial level meetings, in particular the Industrial S&T (IST) Committee and Ministerial Meetings and programmes. The APEC Agenda for S&T Industry Cooperation into the 21st Century was considered by the APEC IST ministers at their meeting in Mexico in November 1998. It is important to note that the agenda states, among others, that ‘in the knowledge-based economy, human resources are the key elements of growth’ and that ‘creative scientific and technical men and women are indispensable not only to fuel innovation but to underpin sustainable industrial productivity and to improve the quality of life.’ The agenda also requests that collaboration and joint research activities be undertaken to have industrial relevance and contribute to sustainable economic growth that would benefit all APEC’s people, including women and youth. At the APEC Ministerial Meeting on Women (2), the participating Ministers issued a landmark Joint Ministerial Statement encompassing the concerns for gender on the theme ‘Women in Economic Development and Cooperation in APEC’. Highlighting the theme Women In Industrial Science and Technology, the Ministers asserted: ‘In the new global, knowledge-based economy, competitive advantage requires a highly skilled and diversified workforce that will increase productivity and fuel innovation. Economies need the talent of their entire population, male and female, to create a leading-edge workforce. This will be achieved through policies that place greater emphasis on science and technology education and training for skills upgrading and reskilling. It further implies the full utilization of women’s talent and competence in these fields.’ The Ministers further commended the APEC Ministers of Science who, at the Conference on Regional Science and Technology Cooperation held in 1996, recognized ‘the importance of removing barriers and promoting the full contribution of women to science and technology as essential elements in meeting APEC’s goal of achieving sustainable and equitable development’ as well as the need to strengthen ‘the exchange of scientific and technical men and women across the region.’

Gender roles in science education in Asia–Pacific region   Back to top

Nebres and Mercado (5), in their paper, looked at the data on science education in the Asia–Pacific region and noted gender differences across countries and across science-related disciplines. In Australia, New Zealand and the Philippines, females outnumber males in the health sciences. In all the countries surveyed, males outnumber females in engineering.

The region also shows great distinctions in science achievement as measured through the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). In terms of gender differences, for example, at 4th grade level, there is no statistical difference in achievement between boys and girls in New Zealand, Singapore and Thailand, but significantly stronger achievement for boys in Australia, Hongkong, Japan and Korea. The situation is similar at 8th grade level, but now boys also have a significantly better achievement than girls in New Zealand. The Philippines’ unweighted data show the girls performing slightly better than the boys except in physics.

Data on how students perceive success in the sciences have been analysed as well. Interestingly, most students ìtended to agree that they did well in the sciences – a perception that did not always coincide with their achievement in the TIMSS science test. There are significant gender differences here, with 8th grade girls in Hong Kong, Japan, New Zealand and Singapore reporting ‘significantly lower self-perceptions than boys about doing well in science.’ Differences are noted with respect to subject areas as well, ‘with the physical sciences having the largest number of countries where boys reported higher self-perception than girls. In the biological sciences, very little difference exists across all countries between boys and girls in their self-perception about doing well. These differences in the self-perception of boys and girls across the science subject areas correspond to the higher performance of boys in the physics and chemistry content areas of the TIMSS science test.’

Key issues   Back to top

The following are the key issues identified in the discussion groups on women and gender in SET:

  • Lack of gender-disaggregated data collection, indicators and collation of information

To assess the scope of the present situation of women in SET careers in public and private sectors, it is essential for policy purposes to establish a system of collecting gender-disaggregated data at the local, national and international levels. A conceptual framework for SET statistics, and identification of critical information needs and data collection, among others, needs to be set up. It is also necessary to develop methodologies that allow cross-cultural dissemination, exchange and comparisons of gender-disaggregated SET data over time.

Gender-disaggregated data provide insights on key issues in women and gender in SET and identify the critical data elements necessary to reveal the causal relationship between the women’s level of SET education/training and their roles in the labour market and the economy. The availability of gender-sensitive statistics provides the means for coordination and collaboration among networks of SET statistical experts and experts on gender issues.

To enhance gender sensitivity in agricultural projects (2), the Philippine Council for Agricultural and Forestry Research and Development initiated the establishment of a database on gender and conducts periodic orientation in agricultural universities and colleges. In Indonesia (1), gender-disaggregated statistics were prepared and published in the late 1980s by the Indonesian Central Bureau of Statistics in close cooperation with the State Ministry for the Role of Women. The statistics cover the fields of population, education, labour force, health, marriage and family planning, family formation, crime, participation in socio-cultural activities and politics. This publication has been updated every two years, the last one being published in 1996. However, reliable gender-disaggregated data on involvement in science and technology, including careers in SET areas, are available only for the government sector and on a very limited scale in the private sector.

  • Lack of a gender-responsive women's environment in SET, limiting provision for women's career development in SET   Back to top

The question of having families and being serious full-time scientist constitutes a major dilemma for women pursuing careers in SET. Present employment and promotion criteria and policies do not allow for family responsibilities. McGregor and Harding (2) assert that the most frequently reported barrier to women in science and technology is the challenge of combining career and family. Furthermore, Ancog (2) explains that women who give priority to child-bearing and child-rearing during periods critical to career development and promotion within the current reward systems suffer the career consequences.

Clearly, there is need for improvement in the decision-making mechanisms within the SET career development system to ensure articulation of the gender-specific needs and goals of women and men in society.

In Indonesia (1), the small number of women who graduated from foreign universities indicates that women have had problems or difficulties in taking advantage of available fellowships for study abroad, even if donor countries or organizations allocate 25–30% of their fellowship to women. Data of higher degree attainment indicate that the proportion of women recipients of scholarships or research awards is lower than for men and these are usually in the 30–39 age group. Generally, married women in this age group, heavily laden with family responsibilities, miss out on opportunities.

  • Inflexible work organization in SET careers   Back to top

Where men and women do not equally share children and household work it is frequently women who sacrifice their education and career opportunities to the home and family. Such choices – so long as society and SET institutions do not value them – will result in lost opportunities to advance careers and compete for tenure or overseas scholarships and constitute a loss to the SET community (2). In Australia, Stocklmayer (7) points out, there is still a serious gender imbalance in many areas. In postgraduate science careers, many young women are unable to balance demands of family with a funding structure that is utterly consuming of their time and energy and which may require many sacrifices, including relocation, in a climate of endless uncertainty, all in the name of pursuit of soft grant money.

Serious consideration is clearly required of alternative work arrangements and family-friendly policies in SET careers. Such arrangements as flexible hours, flexible locations, provisions for child-care, maternity and paternity leave policies show commitment to the hiring, promotion and career development of women in SET while adhering to the merit principles.

  • Gender-stereotyped public images of SET cultures reflecting SET as a male-dominated area   Back to top

Pinna G. Abir-am (2), on disciplinarity, asserted that the distribution of women scientists across disciplines is skewed while reflecting a historical accumulation of cultural stereotypes. She pointed out that the stereotype is evident in medicine, a field compatible with the cultural image of women as nurturers and a concentration on pediatrics, obstetrics and psychiatry. It has been commonly observed that traditional family and cultural values do not support women’s participation in SET.

Coomaraswamy (3), in her country paper, points out that, although educational policies in Sri Lanka provide free primary, secondary and higher education to all, regardless of gender, thereby providing boys and girls with equal opportunities, a discipline-based analysis indicates the existence of gender-stereotyping in primary and secondary schools where girls choose non-science subjects. At the tertiary level there is under-representation of women in the field of science, engineering and other technology-related fields. Among students entering the universities, male students have been found to perform better, with the disparity highest in physical sciences. These observations very well agree with those of Nebres and Mercado (5).

Women working in the pharmaceutical and other industries in Indonesia (1) have realized that automation and the introduction of high technology has made the work easier, less burdening and less hazardous. However, it has been accompanied by employer policies replacing women by men traditionally considered as the focus of technology.

In APEC countries, Ng (6) reports that one of the emerging trends regarding information technology, gender and employment is that the value of women’s work, particularly in the industrial sector, is still perceived as inferior and secondary to men’s work and is thus not rewarded despite technological changes.

  • Insufficient women in decision-making roles so that interests of women, particularly disadvantaged women, are not included   Back to top

There is a need to increase the number of women in science and technology decision-making and policy advisory bodies. Decision-makers should be made to understand the gender implications of their decisions. Women and men should be equally involved in the determination of research priorities and in the design and implementation of technology and development programmes.

In the case of the Philippines (2), the number of women holding senior academic positions such as deanship and chairmanship of science departments is increasing. Perhaps this is the exception rather than the rule. It appears that the gains in a few countries like the Philippines are not easily replicable in the workplaces in other countries. On the other hand, while women constitute the majority of the work force in public-sector agricultural research, they are underrepresented in senior and management positions. More women than men occupy junior-level positions, while men are twice as likely as women to hold senior-level positions.

McGregor and Harding (2) cited the disparity in salaries for equivalent work as well as the lag in promotions and tenure of women in their workplaces, causing a ‘dampening effect upon women’s aspirations and expectations.’ Significantly, they called attention to the ‘glass ceiling’ for women in science and technology decision-making bodies – the higher in the system, the fewer the proportion of women. They further pointed out that this phenomenon cannot be attributed only to a smaller supply pipeline. Appointments are not keeping pace with the increased number of professional women candidates with experience.

In Sri Lanka (3), although constitutionally women should enjoy equal rights with men, there are cultural, religious, attitudinal, political and economic constraints to women achieving their full potential through gender equality. Although career prospects for women in the public sector are theoretically equal to those of men, the percentage of women in decision-making positions and science and technology institutions is very low.

Up to now, women in Indonesia have remained traditionally centred in a limited number of industrial sectors and clustered at the bottom of the rank. In general, Indonesian women are under-represented in SET policy and decision-making structures. (1)

  • Design of educational systems is not conducive to women's full and equal participation in SET   Back to top

The 1995 United Nations Commission on Science and Technology for Development (UNCSTD) Transformative Actions stipulated gender equity in SET education. This implies that:

  • the same opportunities for access to formal education for both girls and boys must be provided;

  • equal opportunity must be provided within school;

  • literacy and basic instruction in SET for both boys and girls must be ensured;

  • use of teaching materials sensitive to gender concerns in terms of language and illustrations must be ensured;

  • the teaching of science should be broadened to include elements addressing the economic, social and ethical implications of science and technology;

  • the importance of mentors and role models through women science teachers must be recognized and rewards must be provided to those who devote substantial time to this activity;

  • opportunities for distance education and re-entry to schools must be provided;

  • multiple opportunities for re-entry, especially for young mothers, must be provided;

  • education programmes with flexible locations and schedules to enable more students, especially girls, to acquire scientific literacy must be introduced;

  • new approaches to SET education like distance learning, making optimal use of both old (radio) and new (multimedia) technologies, must be introduced.    Back to top

In Indonesia (1), the percentage of girls at all levels of education is lower than that of men, particularly at the higher level of education. Available information on public higher education shows that the percentage of women in the field of SET is lower than that of men and women are more under-represented in the higher grades, specially in Engineering Technology and Mathematics and Natural Sciences. It is an accepted fact that most girls frequently experience unequal access to opportunities in education because of socio-economic and cultural obstacles.

A Philippine initiative is worth looking into. The Science Education Institute of the Philippine Department of Science and Technology (2) administers a scholarship programme for science, science teaching, engineering, three-year technical courses or two-year technical courses for students who have completed their secondary education. Mandated by RA No.7687 (1994), the mass-based scholarship programme benefits students who compete in a national examination. For the years 1994–1997, the proportion of male and female scholars was almost equal. It is anticipated that, given the budgetary support required to sustain this programme, the number of women in science and technology in the Philippines will increase through the years. This has implications on the composition of the future workforce and contribution of women to the economy. This implies that the future of women in science will be brighter with bigger opportunities for women to pursue scientific work in laboratories. Women can aspire to achieve breakthroughs in the scientific world. This optimistic scenario assumes that the government will patiently pursue gender-sensitive programmes and faithfully monitor the extent in which women scholars are tracked into science and technology careers after they complete their tertiary education.

  • Lack of training and understanding of gender issues in SET communities   Back to top

Those working in SET have been taught that their task is objective, driven only by the internal attributes of the problems defining the job, and socially neutral when it comes to the influence of the power elite or other interest groups. It is easily assumed that the organizational and professional structures within SET, including advanced training and career development opportunities, are also socially neutral. Seeing them as objectively and typically arising from doing science, engineering or technology, the ways in which the SET workforce is organized tend to be taken for granted and to go unquestioned. Thus these traditional ways and their impact on the lives of women and men involved in SET are often not analysed until difficulties arise and someone asks why things cannot be done differently. The particular issues and problems are usually different from one workplace to another.

There is a clear need for training programmes that promote awareness and increase understanding of gender-specific needs and goals of women and men in SET organizations. The ideas of both women and men in the SET workforce should be sought to ensure distinct articulation of the gender implications of decisions taken, especially in such areas as determination of research and training priorities. Policies against gender discrimination and harassment should be instituted and implemented in the workplace. All SET activities must undergo gender impact analysis before implementation.

In order to enhance women's participation and advancement in SET, work and training must be organized in ways that take equal account of women's and men's life-course patterns. For example, an AUSAID scheme bringing scientists to Australia for postgraduate training and which does not provide work visas for the accompanying spouse, is likely to have difficulties attracting women scientists from countries where men are expected to be the bread-winner. Another point of concern is that of women who have grown up in a culture of harassment in traditionally male-dominated professional areas. In Australia, for instance, among engineering students and navy technicians, if women now entering these areas are to be given an equal chance of success, their specific needs should be addressed. Similarly, while adhering to merit principles, women scientists and engineers who choose to have children should not be penalized and made to follow a lesser career, but should be encouraged with the institution of alternative work arrangements allowing for family responsibilities.

  • Lack of involvement of women in the design of technology, resulting in the production of technologies that do not respond properly and adequately to women's concerns. In a number of cases, these technologies lead to the exploitation of women.   Back to top

In any deficient situation, the worst affected would be the weakest, namely women. Unhealthy cooking practices in smoke-filled kitchens affect the health of housewives and young children in India, reports Kipgen (4) in her country paper. Inefficient traditional cook-stoves consume more firewood. As forest-cover shrinks, women have to walk greater distances to collect fuel-wood. Since so much time is involved in meeting the cooking energy needs of the household, women are unable to spare anytime for social interaction or for income-generating activities. The National Improved Cook-Stove Programme has provided Indian housewives with a low-cost, low-technology device which saves them from drudgery, makes cooking smoke-free and more energy-efficient, and gives them time to be involved in micro-enterprises. Provision of domestic lighting as well has enabled women to work conveniently and safely. India’s Programme on Women and Renewable Energy benefited women, as it addressed the cooking and lighting needs of households. Similar experiences in Indonesia have been related (1).

Among APEC countries, writes Ng (6), an emerging trend in information technologies, gender and employment is that of women employees, who are usually not consulted when new technologies are introduced into the factory or office. They and the unions which represent them do not have any knowledge of the introduction of these technologies. It is only in the smaller firms that are information and communication technology-intensive, like software firms, where forms of fluid management practices occur in a virtual enterprise setting, that employee participation and cooperation are incorporated. Best practices are often introduced into these software firms where, more often than not, women’s prospects for promotion are quite positive. Hence, as noted by Gunnarsson (1997:73) (6), ‘when teleworking is not only seen by managers as a means of relocating work, but also coincides with modern management strategies aiming at a less hierarchical organization, it will probably lead to an increase in gender equality’.

  • Lack of consultation in factory design may exploit the health of women workers.   Back to top

Ng (6) reports that an emerging trend in information technologies, gender and employment among APEC countries is the introduction of new occupational health hazards with the advent of information and communication technologies. Computerization has introduced new work hazards, such as RSI related to work on video display terminals. Women’s reproductive health will also be made more vulnerable. With increased competition under the current trade regime, workers have been required to push up their productivity, increasing their labour intensity under the gaze and surveillance of the computer monitoring key-strokes and telephone conversations. Similar conditions have been observed in companies moving their labour-intensive processes to developing countries where factories often employ women from rural areas who usually have no other employment options and are unaware of means of protecting themselves against unreasonable working conditions. While attracting such enterprises is an important part of the economic strategy of developing countries and women often welcome the opportunity for waged work, it is also important that nations build and sustain schemes that help women negotiate favourable working conditions not damaging to health. Governments should not stand back and allow the health of their women to be sacrificed for short-term gains. As women’s jobs are 'modernized,' women's lives and health should be improved.

  • Women must have access to appropriate research processes, scientific knowledges and technologies to alleviate feminized poverty.   Back to top

Programs are urgently needed that put S&T into the hands of poor women, assisting them in improving nutrition, health, water quality, safety from violence, livelihood security, sustainable energy access, and education. The elimination of the feminization of poverty is the first strategic objective of the Beijing Plan of Action. The Chennai Declaration (December 1997) resulted from a meeting of women scientists held at the Swaminathan Institute in 1997. This meeting was sponsored by the UNDP Asia-Pacific. The Chennai Declaration recommends the use of biotechnology applications to help alleviate feminized poverty. The over-riding drive is for women to gain access to technology. But women should not be incorporated only as passive recipients. Women's needs and knowledge must be incorporated into the technological research phase of projects, and into research on dissemination. The Chennai resolutions envisage biotechnology parks, linked with suitable scientific institutions. These parks would be active in research, but they would also operate as training and education centers. This would build on the training work already being done by a thriving NGO women's technology exchange network- Ecowoman - which has active training programs in place in Fiji and Samoa. One strategy for poverty alleviation, for example, would be to retrain women farmers and horticulturists in techniques for improving food security through plant diversification. Soil health is seen to be important, and vermiculture is mentioned. Post harvest food processing activities, seed production (sale & use), and pollution prevention and control are also referred to. For the larger Asian nations, a biotech park may be viable. For smaller Pacific nation states, a biotechnology network is recommended as more viable, possibly linked to the Institute of Applied Science of the University of the South Pacific (USP). USP is already developing a number of community based technologies. A database of biotechnologies suitable to the Pacific region is to be established, including some of the more advanced ideas from the Chennai meeting. Implementation of the Chennai agreement is urgent. And, the model used for the Chennai meeting could usefully be replicated for other areas of science. The Chennai Declaration established a resource group of women scientists committed to bringing the benefits of science to poor women. Women, particularly rural women, are disproportionately numerous amongst the world’s poor. The agreement recognized that women’s social and economic status declines in direct relation to the intensification of women’s poverty and the degradation of the resources available to women to meet their own and their children’s needs.

Recommendations   Back to top

Thus, the discussion group on Women and Gender in SET recommends the following actions, programmes and initiatives to UNESCO, governments and other organizations. If we are to provide for a new commitment to science and to do this soon, we must acknowledge that science itself must become more flexible, more willing to adapt to local knowledge and local interests, less global and more regional, and more accessible to everyone whatever their gender, Stocklmayer (7) appropriately declares.

Furthermore, Achmad and Hermawati (1) advocate the formation of a Regional Secretariat for Gender, Science and Technology in Southeast Asia and the Pacific.

The Regional Secretariat should be supported in:   Back to top

  • consolidating existing efforts in the region and encouraging the establishment of both a national and regional network of gender-disaggregated statistics, database and the development of SET gender indicators;

  • promoting national and regional networking in gender differential impact studies of SET;

  • encouraging joint effort through national and regional networking to eliminate gender-stereotyped attitudes and discriminatory treatment of women in SET education and careers, in the policy-making process and structures and in the media, so as to create an enabling environment;

  • pioneering regional cooperation in the development of national mechanisms or means to raise public awareness in general and that of governments in particular about the root causes of gender gaps in SET and their negative implications for national development, in order for governments to give priority and more resources for the elimination of the root causes of gender gaps in SET;

  • making an inventory of existing initiatives, institutions, programmes, networks, means or mechanisms dealing with women and gender in SET in the region, to consolidate efforts and minimize or avoid unnecessary duplication;

  • increasing the capability of the National Committees or National Focal Points to initiate and launch policy interventions or pioneering programmes at both national and regional levels.

UNESCO should:   Back to top

  • take the lead in reviewing and reforming its own offices, programmes and research projects for responsiveness to gender;

  • with other United Nations agencies, establish a clearing-house for data, indicators and case studies that support successful interventions that have created change for women and girls in relation to SET;

  • establish a project to develop, document and disseminate lighthouse projects that involve end-users, especially those from disempowered groups, in knowledge generation;

  • establish an information technology project to cross-link Asia–Pacific networks that promote gender reform in SET.

Governments should:   Back to top

  • ensure that all government policies and reports relating to SET include gender analysis;

  • redesign the educational system to ensure gender sensitivity;

  • ensure that governments and other professional organizations address gender balance on all peer-review panels;

  • recognize the increasing role of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) as major players in the promotion and development of S&T. NGOs should be tapped in bringing S&T to the grassroots and mainstreaming women in S&T. NGOs including SET professionals, trade unions and professional associations should be encouraged to pay attention to downstream processes, particularly mass production and use of new technologies, to ensure that gender issues are not compromised.

References   Back to top

(1) Achmad, S. and Hermawati, W. Gender in Science: The Case of Indonesia and the Regional Secretariat for Gender, Science and Technology in Southeast Asia and the Pacific . Paper to the UNESCO Asia-Pacific Conference on Science for the 21st Century, 1-5 December, 1998, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

(2) Ancog, A. Women in Science. Paper to the UNESCO Asia-Pacific Conference on Science for the 21st Century, 1-5 December, 1998, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

(3) Coomaraswamy, U. Women in Science and Development: A Sri Lankan Perspective. Paper to the UNESCO Asia-Pacific Conference on Science for the 21st Century, 1-5 December, 1998, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

(4) Kipgen, K. Renewable Energy For Sustainable Development in the 21st Century. Paper to the UNESCO Asia-Pacific Conference on Science for the 21st Century, 1-5 December, 1998, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

(5) Nebres, B. and Mercado, L. Science Education. Paper to the UNESCO Asia-Pacific Conference on Science for the 21st Century, 1-5 December, 1998, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

(6) Ng, C. Gender Friendly Information Technology: Policies for APEC. Paper presented at the International Conference on "The Engagement of Civil Society in the APEC Process," October 5-7, 1998, Penang, Malaysia.

(7) Stocklmayer, S. Response: Gender Issues. . Presentation to the UNESCO Asia-Pacific Conference on Science for the 21st Century, 1-5 December, 1998, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.


Contact:   Back to top
For further information, please contact:


Associated Meetings List

Back to UNESCOBack to Natural SciencesBack to WCS