UNI-SOL Project Criteria

______________________________________________

 

 

 

1. TARGET THE DISADVANTAGED

The University clearly indicates its focus on one or more targeted disadvantaged groups, e.g., street children, illiterate mothers, illegal immigrants, the chronically jobless, discriminated groups (cultural, religious and other reasons), the handicapped, the lonely aged, people at war, and refugees.
Priority in the selection process will be given to a university choosing one or one or more disadvantaged groups known for their vulnerability and their representativeness in the national context.

 

2. MULTI-DIMENTIONAL APPROACH

The University gives evidence that it can mobilize several faculties or departments to study and act on behalf or a particular disadvantaged group. This incorporates input from faculties/departments such as political sciences, social sciences, economics, etc. Leadership of the project can rest with faculties or departments other than health sciences.
Priority in the selection process will be given to a university involving a wide spectrum of faculties/departments beyond those in the health sciences.

 

3. COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH

The University shows evidence of its contribution through education, research and service functions. In education, for example, students may be offered learning opportunities early and throughout their curricula, with exposure to real life situations – preferentially in multiprofessional groups. In research, activities could center on a health and social perspective analysis of a target group or on operational research, with assessment concerning the impact of intervention programs. In service, activities may be directed toward the planning and delivery of services, with a particular emphasis on preventive measures from a health and a social perspective.
Priority in the selection process will be given to a university showing balanced inputs in education, research and service.

 

4. INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE AND SUSTANAIBILITY

The University has developed a strong relationship with local governments, communities and profession active in the health and social sectors, for the purpose of establishing a durable partnership in support of a particular disadvantaged group and contributing to institutional change.
Priority in the selection process will be given to a university showing evidence of its consistent commitment to institutional change in favor of the disadvantaged.

 


EVIDENCE OF UNIVERSITY COMMITMENT:

The Project should bring evidence of the University's commitment to the disadvantaged by meeting the following criteria:

Institutional backing: The commitment of the University is confirmed by a note signed by the President, Vice Chancellor or a representative of the University leadership.

Coordination mechanism within the University: A list of representatives of the different faculties and departments involved in the project is provided, as well as indication of how coordination will be assured.

Coordination with partners outside the University: A list of representatives of partners other than the University is provided, as well as some indication of how their coordination will be assured.

 

 

 

 

Back