Partial Order Scoring (statistics)

51 Partial Order Scoring

51.1  Special Terminology and Definitions

Let denote a set of elements by V = { a, b, c, ..., } and a binary relation defined on it by R.

a)  Binary relation. A binary relation R in V is such that for any two elements a, b Î V


a R b

For every binary relation R in V there exists a converse relation R+ in V such that


b R+ a

b)  Reflexive and anti-reflexive relation. A relation R is reflexive when


a R a      for all a Î V
otherwise R is anti-reflexive.

c)  Symmetric and anti-symmetric relation. A relation R is symmetric when R = R+, that is when


a R b Û b R a      for all a, b Î V
otherwise R is anti-symmetric.

d)  Transitive relation. A relation R is transitive when


a R b Ù b R c Þ a R c      for all a, b, c Î V

e)  Equivalence relation. A relation R defined on a set of elements V is an equivalence relation when it is:

Note that the commonly used 'equality' relation, ( = ), defined on the set of real numbers is an equivalence relation.

f)  Strict partial order relation. A relation R is called a strict partial order when it satisfies the conditions:

A strict partial order relation is denoted hereafter by « .

g)  Partially ordered set. A set V is called a partially ordered set if a strict partial order relation "«" is defined on it. The fundamental properties of a partially ordered set are:

h)  Ordered set. A set V is called an ordered set if there are two relations " » " and "«" defined on it and they satisfy the axioms of ordering:

In other words, an ordered set is a partially ordered set with additional equivalence relation defined on it, and where the conditions "neither a « b nor b « a" and "a » b" are equivalent.

i)  Subset of elements dominating an element a.


G (a) = {   g   |   g Î V ;   a « g   }

j)  Subset of elements dominated by an element a.


L (a) = {   l   |   l Î V ;   l « a   }

k)  Subset of comparable elements.


C (a) = G (a) ÈL (a)

Note that G (a) ÇL (a) = Æ.

l)  Strict dominance. An element b strictly dominates an element a if


a « b    and    not (b « a)

It can also be said that "b is strictly better than a", or that "a is strictly worse than b".

51.2  Calculation of Scores

Let denote a list of variables to be used in the analysis by


{ x1, x2, ..., xi, ..., xv }

and a priority list associated to them by


{ p1, p2, ..., pi, ..., pv } .

The "partial order relation" constructed on the basis of this collection of variables,


a « b    for any cases a and b

is equivalent to the condition


x1 (a) £ x1 (b),   x2 (a) £ x2 (b),   ...,   xv (a) £ xv (b)

where xi (a) and xi (b) denote values of the ith variable for cases a and b respectively.

When comparing two cases, the variables of highest priority (lowest LEVEL value) are considered first. If they unambiguously determine the relation, the comparison procedure ends. In the situation of equality, the comparison is continued using variables of the next priority level. This procedure is repeated until the relation is determined at one of the priority levels, or the end of the variable list is reached.

For each case a from the analyzed set, the program calculates:



N
 
(a)
=
the number of cases strictly dominating the case a
N (a)
=
the number of cases equivalent to the case a
N (a)
=
the number of cases strictly dominated by the case a

and then one (or two) of the following scores:


s1 (a)
=
S  N (a)  /   æ
è
N (a) + N (a) +
N
 
(a) ö
ø
r1 (a)
=
S - s1 (a)
s2 (a)
=
S   æ
è
N (a) + N (a) ö
ø
 /   æ
è
N (a) + N (a) +
N
 
(a) ö
ø
r2 (a)
=
S - s2 (a)
s3 (a)
=
S  N (a) /  N
r3 (a)
=
S   æ
è

N
 
(a) + N (a) ö
ø
 /  N
s4 (a)
=
S   æ
è
N (a) + N (a) ö
ø
 /  N
r4 (a)
=
S  
N
 
(a)  /  N
where


N
=
total number of cases in the analyzed set
S
=
the value of the scale factor (see the SCALE parameter).

The values of the ORDER parameter select the score(s) as follows:


ASEA
:
r3 (a)
DEEA
:
s4 (a)
ASCA
:
r4 (a)
DESA
:
s3 (a)
ASER
:
s1 (a), r1 (a)
DESR
:
s1 (a), r1 (a)
ASCR
:
s2 (a), r2 (a)
DEER
:
s2 (a), r2 (a) .

51.3  References

Debreu, G., Representation of a preference ordering by a numerical function, Decision Process, eds. R.M. Thrall, C.A. Cooubs and R.L. Davis, New York, 1954.

Hunya, P., A Ranking Procedure Based on Partially Ordered Sets, Internal paper, JATE, Szeged, 1976.