Contents - Previous - Next


Appendix 9

COUNTRY (STATE, PROVINCE OR REGION): _________________________________________
Respondant's name and title: __________________________________________________________

N.B.: RAMP studies referred to in questions 1 through 5 are listed according to author's name and corresponding PGI publication code. Complete bibliographic references may be found in the enclosed bibliography. Questions 11, 12 and 13 call for author's name and PGI code only.

1. Does your institution have any of the following RAMP studies?

2. Which RAMP studies are used, referred to?

3. Keeping in mind the archive policies enforced in your country how would you evaluate the content of RAMP studies?

3.1 Adapted to your institutional needs
3.2 Too advanced
3.3 Outdated
3.4 Poor

4. In the event that RAMP studies are missing from your collection or are never referred to, please indicate the reasons:

4.1 Irrelevance of subject matter
4.2 Other information sources available on the subject
4.3 Unavailability of the study
4.4 Language of document

5. If circulation statistics are available, please indicate how often the RAM studies were in circulation during the past year:

5.1 Very often (more than 5 tines a year)
5.2 Often (between 2 and 5 times a year)
5.3 Rarely (less than twice a year)
5.4 Never

  QUESTION 1 QUESTION 2 QUESTION 3 QUESTION 4 QUESTION 5
1 Study held 2 Study used 3.1 Adapted to needs 3.2 Too advanced 3.3 Outdated 3.4 Poor 4.1 Irrelevance of study 4.2 Other information available 4.3 Study not available 4.4 Language 5.1 Very often 5.2 Often 5.3 Rarely 5.4 Never
Policies and plans: archivists
BOWDEN PGI-89/WS/11                            
HACHI PGI-86/WS/21                            
ORLÉANS, d' PGI-85/WS/2                            
TANODI PGI-85/WS/13                            
Policies and plans: miscellaneous
DOYLE/FRENIERE PGI-91/WS/18                            
GREEN PGI-91/WS/19                            
KETELAAR PGI-85/WS/9                            
LAAR, VAN PGI-85/WS/3                            
MOIDEEN PGI-83/WS/19                            
RHOADS PGI-83/WS/21                            
RHOADS (rev. ed.) PGI-89/WS/6                            
Methods, norms and standards: surveys and appraisal
CHARMAN PGI-84/WS/26                            
GUPTIL PGI-85/WS/4                            
HARRISON/
SCHUURMA
PGI-87/WS/1                            
HULL PGI-81/WS/26                            
KULA PGI-83/WS/18                            
LEARY PGI-85/WS/10                            
NAUGLER PGI-84/WS/27                            
Methods, norms and standards: preservation and restoration
BENOIT/NEIRINCK PGI-87/WS/18                            
BUCHANAN PGI-88/WS/6                            
CHAPMAN PGI-90/WS/7                            
CLEMENTS PGI-87/WS/15                            
CRESPO/VIÑAS PGI-84/WS/25                            
CUHNA PGI-88/WS/16                            
HENDRIKS PGI-84/WS/1                            
BORDER PGI-90/WS/17                            
McCLEARY PGI-87/WS/7                            
PARKER PGI-88/WS/20                            
PASCOE PGI-88/WS/18                            
ROPER PGI-89/WS/4                            
SERRANO RIVAS PGI-87/WS/6                            
THOMAS PGI-86/WS/23                            
THOMAS PGI-86/WS/22                            
VIÑAS/VIÑAS PGI-88/WS/17                            
WACHTER PGI-89/WS/14                            
WOOD LEE PGI-88/WS/9                            
Methods, norms and standards: arrangement and description
HILDESHEIMER PGI-83/WS/9                            
Methods, norms and standards: dissemination, access and reprography
DUCHEIN PGI-83/WS/20                            
FRANZ PGI-86/WS/18                            
JUBB PGI-84/WS/9                            
KEENE/ROPER PGI-84/WS/8                            
MAZIKANA PGI-90/WS/8                            
TAYLOR PGI-84/WS/5                            
TIRMIZI PGI-82/WS/12                            
ULATE SEGURA PGI-86/WS/24                            
WEILL PGI-81/WS/25                            
Methods, norms and standards: miscellaneous
COOK PGI-86/WS/15                            
DOLLAR PGI-86/WS/12                            
EVANS PGI-83/WS/5                            
EVANS/KETELAAR PGI-83/WS/6                            
FREDBERG/PIEYNS PGI-88/WS/15                            
GAVREL PGI-90/WS/12                            
HILDESHEIMER PGI-86/WS/13                            
MOSS/MAZIKANA PGI-86/WS/2                            
RHOADS PGI-82/WS/4                            
ROPER PGI-86/WS/16                            
SETON PGI-84/WS/6                            
STARK PGI-83/WS/26                            
WHITE PGI-81/WS/10                            
WIMALARATNE PGI-84/WS/7                            
Training and education
CLEMENTS et al. PGI-89/WS/15                            
COOK PGI-86/WS/26                            
COOK PGI-82/WS/16                            
FISHBEIN PGI-85/WS/27                            
KATHPALIA PGI-84/WS/2                            
UNESCO PGI-90/WS/9                            
WALNE/MABBS PGI-85/WS/32                            
WHITE PGI-82/WS/8                            

6. How were the RAMP studies acquired?

6.1 Documents distributed by UNESCO 
6.2 Requests addressed to UNESCO 
6.3 Xeroxed copies of documents held by other institutions 
6.4 Other ways (please specify): ____________________________

7. How did your institution become aware of RAMP studies?

7.1 Awareness of the RAMP programme 
7.2 UNESCO (correspondence, RAMP studies distribution) 
7.3 Presentation by UNESCO delegates during passions or pilot projects 
7.4 Studies presented at congresses, workshops, seminars, etc. 
7.5 UNESCO publication lists, indexes, circulars, etc. 
7.6 Online searches 
7.7 Book and/or journal citations or bibliographies 
7.8 Article abstracts 
7.9 Colleagues 
7.10 Other ways (please specify): ___________________________

8. How would you evaluate the format of the RAMP studies?

8.1 Excellent 
8.2 Good 
8.3 Average 
8.4 Below average 
8.5 Poor 

9. Have you ever had to borrow unavailable studies from other institutions?
 Yes  No

10. How do the professors at your institution use RAMP studies?

10.1 Lecture or workshop material 
10.2 Theoretical research applications 
10.3 Curriculum development 
10.4 Other applications (please specify): _________________________

11. Have the bibliographies included in RAMP studies helped you discover other material of interest?
 Yes  No

Please list studies:___________________________________________

12. Please list the RAMP studies which are of greater interest to you: ________________________________________________________________________________

13. Please list the RAMP studies you wish were developed or updated: ________________________________________________________________________________

14. Please indicate subject matters you wish were addressed: ________________________________________________________________________________

15. Please indicate any comment you may have on RAMP studies or on the programme in general: ________________________________________________________________________________


Contents - Previous - Next